Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am reading a paper, and I see someone decompose a divergence operator as follows. Could someone judge and see if it is correct?

$$\nabla \cdot {\bf{v}} = \left( {{\bf{n}} \cdot \nabla } \right){v_n} + {\nabla _\parallel } \cdot {{\bf{v}}_t}$$

Notation: $\bf{v}$ is velocity vector field, and $n$ means normal, $t$ is tangent component.

I do not understand why ${\bf{v}}_t$ is a vector and $v_n$ is not.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Well, you can keep $\mathbf v_n$ as a vector and decompose $\mathbf v$ into its normal and tangential components as $\mathbf v = \mathbf v_n + \mathbf v_t$. But $\mathbf v_n$ has only one degree of freedom, so it's easier to write $\mathbf v_n = v_n \mathbf n$ and deal with only a scalar $v_n$. The tangential component on the other hand has two degrees of freedom in three dimensions, so you can't do this... Unless you introduce a basis, say vectors $\mathbf a, \mathbf b$, on the tangent plane, and then write $\mathbf v_t = v_a \mathbf a + v_b \mathbf b$ and $\nabla_\parallel\cdot\mathbf v_t = (\mathbf a\cdot\nabla)v_a + (\mathbf b\cdot\nabla)v_b$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.