Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Say I have two independent random variables, $X$ and $Y$. If I give you a 90% confidence interval on each $(x_1,x_2)$ and $(y_1,y_2)$, i.e. $P(X\in(x_1,x_2))=.9$ and $P(Y\in(y_1,y_2))=.9$. If I asked you for a 90% confidence interval on their ratio $Z=X/Y$, what would you do? My first step was to just start with the interval $(x_1/y_2,x_2/y_1)$. However, I would imagine that this is only an 81% confidence interval and thus my full answer is just that I know there exist 90% confidence which properly contains the interval $(x_1/y_2,x_2/y_1)$.

However there are many things wrong with this.

Case 1: $(x_1/y_2,x_2/y_1)$ may actually be a 90% confidence interval. If we let $X$ and $Y$ be i.i.d. uniform on $(0,1)$ and I pick $x_1,y_1=.1$ and $x_2,y_2=1$ I get the interval $(.1,10)$ which is a 90% confidence interval for $Z$. That is, somehow I got a exact interval even though there should only be an $.81$ probability that $X$ and $Y$ are in $(.1,1)$. However, this is where I realized that it's not an 81% confidence interval, because in the .01 case that both $X$ and $Y$ are not in the $(.1,1)$, there are non-negligible ways to produce some of the ratios in $(.1,10)$, however, this shouldn't account for nearly as much as it does to make the interval $(.1,10)$ a 90% confidence interval.

Case 2: Same thing, but I pick $x_1,y_1=0$ and $x_2,y_2=.9$, and thus using my flawed method get the confidence interval to be $(0,\infty)$ which is obviously not a 90% confidence interval for $Z$ but a 100% one. How could it possible be the case now that I actually have to shrink my computed interval to get a 90% confidence interval.

Case 3: Same thing but I pick the more innocuous $x_1,y_1=0.05$ and $x_2,y_2=.95$. In this case I get a 94.71% confidence interval.

I don't get it, what is making this so counterintuitive for me.

share|improve this question
1  
this is not a paradox since special cases you've described does not contradict with a general case: all probabilities are above $0.81$; "in general" means that something always hold, but of course in each particular case you can have better result. –  Ilya May 25 '12 at 10:59
    
I'm just wondering what was wrong with the first paragraphs logic that asserts there exists a 90% confidence interval $(i,j)$ that properly contains $(x_1/y_2,x_2/y_1)$. This obviously isn't true if the the interval itself has confidence greater than 90% already. –  Steven-Owen May 25 '12 at 11:03
    
If your question is what's wrong with the first paragraph's logic, you'll have to first state that logic. Currently all it says is "However, I would imagine", and all we can say about that is, "Well, you're imagining incorrectly". –  joriki May 25 '12 at 11:23

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

It is true (enough) that you have 81% confidence that $X \in (x_1,x_2)$ and $Y \in (y_1,y_2)$. It is true (assuming all positive numbers) that if $X \in (x_1,x_2)$ and $Y \in (y_1,y_2)$, then $X/Y \in (x_1/y_2, x_2/y_1)$.

It is not generally true that if $X/Y \in (x_1/y_2, x_2/y_1)$, then $X \in (x_1,x_2)$ and $Y \in (y_1,y_2)$.

Basically, you only counted some of the ways in which you could have $X/Y \in (x_1/y_2, x_2/y_1)$, and consequently, all you have shown is that 81% is a lower bound on the probability of it happening.

share|improve this answer
    
Is that the best lower bound? –  Steven-Owen May 25 '12 at 20:06
    
It shouldn't be hard to construct sample spaces where there are no other ways for $X/Y$ to be in that interval. e.g. the only outcomes of $X$ are in $(x_1, x_2)$ and some other interval $I$ of very large numbers where as $Y$ is limited to $(y_1,y_2)$ and some other interval $J$ of very tiny numbers. If you don't like the disjointness, you should be able to still get arbitrarily close to 81%. –  Hurkyl May 25 '12 at 23:03

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.