Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Latest homework question in measure and integration theory course. Suppose that $f_n : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ are integrable, $f_n ≥0$ and $f_n(x) \to f(x)$ for every $x $. Suppose that $$\int f_n\to c≥0 .$$ Show that $\int f$ exists and $0≤ \int f ≤ c$. Show by examples that every value in $[0 ,c]$ is possible.

I can show $\int f$ exist by showing $\int|f|$ being finite and use Fatou's lemma to show $\int f ≤ \liminf \int f_n = c$. But I can't do the part that $\int f ≥ 0 $. I am also confused since $\int f =\int\lim f_n $, how could I find an example that the Lebesgue integral is not fixed.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

By pointwise comparison you have that $0 \leq \liminf f_n(x) = \lim f_n(x) = f(x)$ so that $\int f \geq 0$.

To show that every value in $[0,c]$ is possible, we need to construct a different $f$ (and hence a different $(f_n)$) for each $\lambda\in[0,c]$. We do so as follows:

Let $$ g_n(x) = \begin{cases} n & x\in (0,1/n] \\ 0 &\text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$ and let $$ h(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & x\in [-1,0) \\ 0 &\text{otherwise}\end{cases} $$

Observe that $\int g_n \mathrm{d}x = 1 = \int h\mathrm{d}x$.

Let $$f_{n,\lambda} = (c-\lambda) g_n(x) + \lambda h(x)$$ clearly $$ \int f_{n,\lambda} = c $$ so $$ \liminf_{n\to\infty} f_{n,\lambda} = c$$

But pointwise you have that $$ f_\lambda(x) := \lim_{n\to\infty} f_{n,\lambda}(x) = \lambda h(x) $$ using that the pointwise limit $$ \lim g_n(x) = 0 $$ for any $x$. This implies that $$ \int f_\lambda(x) \mathrm{d}x = \lambda \in [0,c] $$ as desired.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1) That was just what I was going to write! :) – AD. May 24 '12 at 15:25

If $\int f < 0$, then $f < 0$ on a set of positive measure (but really, you only need to know that for some $x_0$, $f(x_0) < 0$). Since $f_n(x)\rightarrow f(x)$ for each $x$, for some $x_0$ you must have $f_n(x_0) < 0$ for some $n$, contradicting the hypothesis. Now, just because $\int f = \int \lim_n f_n$ does not mean that $\int f = \lim_n \int f_n$. For example, take $f = 0$,let $f_n = 0$ on the negative real half-line, and for $x\geq 0$, define $f_n$ as follows:

$f_n(x) = 0$ if $x > 1/n$, and $f_n(x) = n$ for all $x\in [0, 1/n]$. Obviously $\int f_n = 1$ for all $n$, $f_n \rightarrow f$ and $\int f = 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
PS. I'll leave it up to you to prove that $\int f$ can take any value in $[0, c]$ (I've done most of the work for you above, now try to generalize). – William May 24 '12 at 14:17

Well notice that $f\geq 0$ because $f_n\geq 0$ the by Fatou's Lemma we get

$\int f \leq \liminf \int f_n =c< \infty$.

For the example, for each $0\leq \lambda \leq c$ consider the sequence of functions


share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.