Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose $T$ is a bounded operator on a Banach Space $X$ and $Y$ is a non-trivial closed invariant subspace for $T$. It is fairly easy to show that for the point spectrum one has $\sigma_p(T_{|Y})\subseteq\sigma_p(T)$ and this is also true for the approximate point spectrum, i.e. $\sigma_a(T_{|Y})\subseteq\sigma_a(T)$. However I think it is not true in general that $\sigma(T_{|Y})\subseteq\sigma(T)$. We also have

$$ \partial(\sigma(T_{|Y}))\subseteq\sigma_a(T_{|Y})\subseteq\sigma_a(T) $$

Hence $\sigma(T_{|Y})\cap\sigma(T)\ne\emptyset$. Moreover, if $\sigma(T)$ is discrete then $\partial(\sigma(T_{|Y}))$ is also discrete, which implies that $\partial(\sigma(T_{|Y}))=\sigma(T_{|Y})$, so at least in this case the inclusion $\sigma(T_{|Y})\subseteq\sigma(T)$ holds true. So for example holds true for compact, strictly singular and quasinilpotent operators.

Question 1: Is it true, as I suspect, that $\sigma(T_{|Y})\subseteq\sigma(T)$ doesn't hold in general? A counterexample will be appreciated. On $l_2$ will do, as I think that on some Banach spaces this holds for any operators. For example, if $X$ is hereditary indecomposable (HI), the spectrum of any operator is discrete.

Question 2 (imprecise): If the answer to Q1 is 'yes', is there some known result regarding how large the spectrum of the restriction can become?

Thank you.

share|improve this question
    
Given any two nonempty compact subsets $K_1,K_2$ of the complex plane with $\partial K_2\subseteq K_1$, you should be able to find a bounded normal operator $T$ on $\ell^2$ with $\sigma(T)=K_1$ and $\sigma(T\vert_Y)=K_2$ for some subspace $Y$. –  George Lowther May 24 '12 at 1:21
    
In fact, given any bounded operator $T$ on a Banach space with spectrum $K$ then, for any closed bounded set $K^\prime$ containing $K$ and with boundary contained in $K$, there exists a closed invariant subspace on which $T$ has spectrum $K^\prime$. –  George Lowther May 24 '12 at 12:31
    
@GeorgeLowther I am a bit suspicious about your last statement. What if $T$ doesn't have any invariant subspaces? –  Theo May 24 '12 at 13:20
    
@GeorgeLowther When you have time, could you write a proof of this claim, or give a reference if there is any, I think it is quite interesting. Thanks you! –  Theo May 24 '12 at 15:57
    
I thought that was true, but am no longer so sure. It could be false. The idea is to consider the closed subspace $Y$ generated by $(\lambda-T)^{-1}x$ for $\lambda\in\mathbb{C}\setminus K^\prime$ and some fixed nonzero $x\in X$. This is $T$-invariant with spectrum lying between $\partial K$ and $K^{\prime}$. The idea is then to show that for "almost all" possible choices of $x$, then for $\lambda\in K^\prime\setminus K$, $(\lambda-T)^{-1}x$ is not in $Y$. I'm not convinced that this true now, although it does work in many cases. –  George Lowther May 26 '12 at 11:07

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

For example, consider the right shift operator $R$ on $X = \ell^2({\mathbb Z})$, $Y = \{y \in X: y_j = 0 \ \text{for}\ j < 0\}$. Then $Y$ is invariant under $R$, and $\sigma(R)$ is the unit circle while $\sigma(R|_Y)$ is the closed unit disk.

share|improve this answer

E.g., looking for a case where $0$ is in the spectrum of $T|_Y$ but not in the spectrum of $T$ amounts to looking for an invertible extension of an injective nonsurjective operator. To have any hope, $T|_Y$ should also be bounded below. In the case where $T_Y$ is an isometry on Hilbert space, there is always a unitary extension, and Robert Israel's answer gives the canonical example of this.

If $A$ is a bounded, bounded below, nonsurjective operator on a Hilbert space $H$, then let $T$ be defined on the Hilbert space $H\oplus H$ by the operator matrix $\begin{bmatrix}A&I+A^*\\0&A^*\end{bmatrix}$. We recover $A$ as the restriction of $T$ to $H\oplus \{0\}$, and $A$ is not invertible.

However, $T$ is invertible. If $T\begin{bmatrix}x\\y\end{bmatrix}=0$, then $A^*y=0$ and $Ax+y=0$. Since $y\in\ker(A^*)=(AH)^\perp$, it follows that $Ax=y=0$, hence $x=0$. This shows that $T$ is injective. To see that $T$ is surjective, let $a$ and $b$ be arbitrary elements of $H$. Since $A$ is bounded below, $A^*$ is onto, so there exists $y_0\in H$ with $A^*y_0=b$. Since $A$ has closed range, $H=AH\oplus \ker(A^*)$, so there exists $x\in H$ and $z\in\ker(A^*)$ such that $Ax+z=a-b-y_0$. It follows that $T\begin{bmatrix}x\\y_0+z\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}a\\b\end{bmatrix}$.

If $A$ is an isometry, then $\begin{bmatrix}A&I-AA^*\\0&A^*\end{bmatrix}$ is a unitary operator that extends $A$. If $A$ is not unitary, its spectrum is the closed unit disk, and the spectrum of the extension is the unit circle.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.