Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let ${\Omega _1}$,${\Omega _2}$ be two open sets in $\mathbb R^n$ and $f$ is a diffeomorphism between them. For every $x$ in ${\Omega _1}$, is there an open set $\Omega_{x} \subset \Omega_1$ and a diffeomorphism $g$ of $\mathbb R^n$ such that $g=f$ when restricted to $\Omega_{x}$?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Assume $x\in \Omega_1$ such that $Df(x) = A$. Wolg $x=0$ and $f(0) =0$, otherwise the following reasoning needs to be 'translated'. Now let $\phi (x)= \psi(||x||)$ be a smooth radially symmetric cutoff function which is identically $0$ outside of $B_t(0)$ and $=1$ inside, say, $B_{t/2}(0)$, s.t. $\psi^'(t) \le O(1/t)$ . Assume $B_t(0)\subset \Omega_1.$

Now look at

$$ F(x):= (1-\phi(x)) Ax + \phi(x) f(x) $$

which is defined for every $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$ (it's easy to see that this is possible).

For $||x|| \ge t$ this is just $Ax$.

For $||x||< t$ denote $r=||x||$ and calculate for $v$ such that $||v||= 1$ $$DF(x) v = -\psi^'(r)<\frac{x}{r},v> Ax +(1-\phi(x))Av +\psi^'(r)<\frac{x}{r}, v> f(x) + \phi(x) Df(x)v\\ = Av + \phi(x)(Df(x)v-Av) +\psi^'(r) <\frac{x}{r}, v>(f(x)-Ax)$$

The first term on the rhs is nonzero for nonzero $v$, since $A$ is invertible. Note that it does not depend on $t$, and since the sphere is compact it's norm is bounded from below by a constant.

The second term is arbitrarily small, since $ f$ is continuously differentiable (I do assume continuity of $Df$) and $\phi$ is bounded, if only $t$ is small enough.

Since $f(x)-Ax = o(x)$ the third term also becomes arbitrarily small given the growth rate of $\psi$.

In response to a comment from Leonid Kovalev: from $$F(x)-F(y) =Ax-Ay - \phi(x)(Ax-f(x)) +\phi(y)(Ay - f(y))$$ it is easy to see that $F$ is 1-1, using the $f(x)-Ax=o(||x||)$ property and the fact that $A$ invertible. The fact that $F$ is onto follows, e.g., by elementary degree theory from the fact that $F=A$ on the boundary of $B_t(0)$. It is probably possible to see this with a more elementary reasoning, for which I don't have the time right now.

An alternative reasoning which you may find more satisfying: according to Thm. 1.7 in Hirsch's Differential Topology the set of diffeomorphisms is open in $C^1(\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R}^n)$. The $F$ I have constructed is arbitrarily close to $x\mapsto Ax$ in $C^1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Something should be said about the global invertibility of $F$. – user31373 May 23 '12 at 18:42
@LeonidKovalev ok, valid point. I did say something about global invertibility of $F$. – user20266 May 23 '12 at 19:24
Thanks! I did not doubt that your proof works, just wanted to make this point for the sake of other readers. For the same reason I'll add that the computations would be a bit tidier with the normalization $Df(x)=I$ (achieved by composition with a linear invertible map). – user31373 May 23 '12 at 19:27
@LeonidKovalev: this time I disagree. If, by accident or transformation, $A=I$, it is (in my opinion, your mileage may vary) less transparent, which term is a derivative and which is evaluation of a function. – user20266 May 23 '12 at 19:34
Nice proof. BTW, that $F$ is a diffeomorphism is easy if we notice that $F$ is proper. – Hezudao May 24 '12 at 1:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.