Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Inspired by Logarithmic derivative on the critical strip, I would like to ask, if it is possible to write $\pi(n)$ as a sum of step functions like the following: $$ \pi(n)=\sum_{k=1}^{N} H(n-p_k), \tag{$\ast$} $$ with $p_k$ the $k$th prime, $p_N\le n$ and $H(x)$ being the Heaviside Step Functions and further use $$ H(x) = \int_{-\infty}^x { \delta(t)} \, \mathrm{d}t, $$ such that ($\ast$) gets $$ \pi(n)=\sum_{k=1}^{N} \int_{-\infty}^{(n-p_k)} { \delta(t)} \, \mathrm{d}t ? $$

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Some comments: first of all, you can even write $$ \pi(n) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty H(n-p_k) $$ since $H(n-p_k) = 0$ for all $p_k>n$ so these terms do not change the sum. Following the same reasoning, you can write $$ \pi(n) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty\int\limits_{-\infty}^{n-p_k}\delta(t)\mathrm dt $$ if only it help to deal with $\pi$. Here you should be careful with explicitly mentining that $$ \int\limits_{-\infty}^0\delta(t)\mathrm dt :=1. $$ Also, in your case $N = \pi(n)$ as I guess, so of course all formulas are true: $$ \pi(n) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^N H(n-p_k) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^{\pi(n)} H(n-p_k) $$ and $$ \pi(n) = \sum\limits_{k=1}^N\int\limits_{-\infty}^{n-p_k}\delta(t)\mathrm dt =\sum\limits_{k=1}^{\pi(n)}\int\limits_{-\infty}^{n-p_k}\delta(t)\mathrm dt. $$ Finally, these formulas work for any increasing sequence $p_k$, not necessary being prime numbers.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for your answer. May I call $\int\limits_{-\infty}^{n-p_k}\delta(t)\mathrm dt$ the characteristic function of primes, since summing over it gives back $\pi(n)$? Somehow this doesn't feel correct... –  draks ... Jun 4 '12 at 13:07
    
@draks: The integral expression you have depends on both $n$ and $k$. They are the characteristic functions of the sets $[p,\infty)$ for primes $p$. –  anon Jun 4 '12 at 13:21
    
Is that dependance on $n$ and $k$ a problem? And so the sum over the integrals is the characteristic function of ALL primes? –  draks ... Jun 4 '12 at 13:43
    
@draks I didn't get your first sentence, sorry. –  Ilya Jun 4 '12 at 20:30
    
Maybe it becomes clearer when I write it like $\sum \int_{-\infty}^n \delta(t-p_k)dt$. Taking this Definition $\chi_{P} (x):=\begin{cases} 0,&x\in P \\ +\infty, & x \not \in P \end{cases}\,\,$, my sum looks like the inverse (forgot that before) of a characteristic function of primes, doesn't it? –  draks ... Jun 4 '12 at 20:57

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.