Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Help me please, how can I to show that Poincaré inequality in unbounded domain doesn't holds?

Thanks a lot!

If $\Omega$ is a bounded domain and $u \in H_{0}^{1}(\Omega)$ the following inequality holds : $\left \| u \right \|_{L^{2}(\Omega) }\leq c \left \| \nabla u \right \|_{L^{2}(\Omega) } $

where $c$ depends only on $\Omega$ and not on $u$.

share|improve this question
    
can u write down the inequality , just for reference ! –  Theorem May 23 '12 at 9:56
    
@Ananda I have added inequality, thanks! –  Lilly May 23 '12 at 10:20
1  
Is this homework? If it is then you should add the tag [homework]. In any case, start with $\Omega=\mathbb{R}$ and consider a sequence of functions which are constant on $[-n, n]$ then decay smoothly and vanish outside of $[-n-1, n+1]$. Suppose by contradiction that the inequality holds and see what happens for $n \to \infty$. –  Giuseppe Negro May 23 '12 at 10:26
    
Thanks, it is not homework. Thanks for example. –  Lilly May 25 '12 at 9:57
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted
  • Poincaré inequality is true if $\Omega$ is bounded in a direction or of finite measure in a direction.
  • But not in general: if $\Omega=\mathbb R$, $\varphi$ smooth with compact support and such that $\varphi=1$ on $[0,1]$, $\varphi(x)=0$ if $x\geq 2$ (bump function), $\varphi_n(t)=\varphi\left(\frac tn\right)$, we have $$\lVert \varphi_n\rVert_{L^2}^2=\int_0^{+\infty}\varphi\left(\frac tn\right)^2dt= n\int_0^{+\infty}\varphi(s)^2ds\geq n$$ and $$\lVert\varphi'_n\rVert^2_{L^2}=\frac 1{n^2}\int_0^{+\infty}\varphi'\left(\frac tn\right)^2dt=\frac 1n\int_0^{+\infty}\varphi'(s)^2ds$$ so Poincaré inequality cannot be true (if it was, we would be able to find $c>0$ such that $\lVert \varphi_n\rVert^2_{L^2}\leq c^2\lVert \varphi'_n\rVert_{L^2}$ hence $n\leq c^2\frac 1n$ for each $n$, which obviously can't hold).
  • For necessary and sufficient conditions, I don't know.
share|improve this answer
    
Thanks a lot, very good explanation and example. –  Lilly May 25 '12 at 9:56
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.