Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ and $Y$ be affine varieties and $f: X \rightarrow Y$ a polynomial map. If the induced map on coordinate rings $K[Y] \rightarrow K[X]$ is surjective why this implies that $f$ is injective?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

If $x\neq x'\in X$, then there exists $\phi\in K[X]$ with $\phi(x)=0$ and $\phi(x')=1$.
Let $\phi= f^\ast \psi=\psi\circ f$ for some $\psi \in K[Y] $ (surjectivity hypothesis).
Then $\psi( f(x))=(f^\ast \psi)(x)=\phi(x)=0$ whereas $\psi( f(x'))=(f^\ast \psi)(x')=\phi(x')=1$, and of course the inequality $\psi( f(x))\neq \psi( f(x')) $ forces $f(x)\neq f(x')$.

Edit (answer to Heitor's question in comment)
If the ring morphism $f^\ast:K[Y] \rightarrow K[X]$ is surjective then the morphism of varieties $f:X\to Y$ is closed and in particular $f(X)\subset Y$ is algebraic.
However just assuming that a morphism of affine varieties $g:X\to Y$ is injective does not guarantee that $g(X)$ is closed.
A simple counter-example is the open immersion $X=\mathbb A^1\setminus \{0\}\hookrightarrow Y=\mathbb A^1$ whose image $X$ is clearly not closed in $Y$.

[Reminder: $X=\mathbb A^1\setminus \{0\}$ is affine with function ring equal to $K[T,T^{-1}]$.
More geometrically the variety $X$ is isomorphic to the affine hyperbola $xy=1$ in the plane $\mathbb A^2$]

share|cite|improve this answer
why such $\phi$ exists? – user31509 May 20 '12 at 8:01
Since $X$ is affine, we have $X\subset A^n$ for some $n$. Since $x=(a_1,...,a_n) \neq x'=(a'_1,...,a'_n)$, some coordinate of $\mathbb A^n$ is different for those two points: say $a_1\neq a'_1$. You may then take $\phi(t_1,...,t_n)=\frac {t_1-a_1}{a'_1-a_1}$ – Georges Elencwajg May 20 '12 at 8:51
@GeorgesElencwajg. I was wondering: is this enough (I mean $f$ injective) to conclude that $f$ is then closed, i.e. $f(X)$ is algebraic ? – Heitor Fontana May 31 '13 at 11:29
Dear @Heitor, I have written a detailed answer to your question in an Edit. – Georges Elencwajg May 31 '13 at 11:58
@GeorgesElencwajg: If both $x,x^{\prime}\in X$ and $X$ is an affine variety (irreducible algebraic set) then why only $x$ is the zero of $\phi$ while $x^{\prime}$ is not? – H.E Feb 3 '14 at 15:52

I'll assume you understand the correspondence between maximal ideals of $K[X]$ and points of $X$. I'll also assume the base field $k$ is algebraically closed. Then, for every point $p$ of $X$, there is a unique $k$-algebra homomorphism $\epsilon_p : K[X] \to k$ corresponding to $p$. We compose this with the pullback map $f^* : K[Y] \to K[X]$ to $\epsilon_{f (p)} : K[Y] \to k$. Now, suppose $f (p) = f (p')$. Then $\epsilon_{f (p)} = \epsilon_{f (p')}$, but then that means $\epsilon_p \circ f^* = \epsilon_{p'} \circ f^*$, and hence, $\epsilon_p = \epsilon_{p'}$ if $f^*$ is surjective. But that implies $p = p'$, so $f$ is injective.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.