Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why is integral of $x$ from $-1$ to $1$ $x^2/2$ rather than $x^2$?

share|improve this question
18  
The integral of $x$ from -1 to 1 is neither of those! Remember that a definite integral (with limits of integration) is a number (think area under the curve) not a function. If you leave off the limits of integration, then you're talking about the antiderivative, and your question makes more sense. –  cch Dec 17 '10 at 17:33
add comment

3 Answers 3

First, the integral of $x$ from $-1$ to $1$ is a number, not a function. Definite integrals give you the net signed area between the $X$-axis and the function. So the integral of $x$ from $-1$ to $1$ is neither $x^2$ nor $x^2/2$.

Second, the indefinite integral of $x$ is a family of functions, namely, the family of all functions $F(x)$ such that $F'(x)=x$; that is, the family of antiderivatives of $x$. Since the indefinite integral is a family of functions and not a single function, the indefinite integral of $x$ is neither $x^2/2$ nor $x^2$.

Now, by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, if you are trying to compute the definite integral of a function $f(x)$ that is continuous on $[a,b]$, and you are lucky enough to have any antiderivative $F(x)$ of $f(x)$, then you can compute the definite integral as the Total Change of $F(x)$ on $[a,b]$. That is, $$\int_a^b f(x)\,dx = F(b)-F(a).$$

So, in order to compute $$\int_{-1}^1 x\,dx$$ you have several choices:

  1. Find the net signed area geometrically. This is very easy in this case, because all you have is two triangles that cancel each other, so the net signed area is $0$. That is, $\int_{-1}^1 x\,dx = 0$.

  2. Use the definition of the integral as a limit of Riemann sums. Again, not hard to do: the function $y=x$ is increasing, the left hand and right hand sums are easy to compute, and the limit turns out to be $0$. For example, the left hand Riemann sum with $n$ intervals, each of equal length $\frac{2}{n}$, is: \begin{align*} \mathrm{LHS}(n) &= \frac{-n}{n}\left(\frac{2}{n}\right) + \frac{-n+2}{n}\left(\frac{2}{n}\right) + \cdots + \frac{n-2}{n}\left(\frac{2}{n}\right)\\ &= \frac{2}{n^2}\Bigl(-n + (-n+2) + (-n+4)+\cdots+\bigl(-n+(2n-2)\bigr)\Bigr)\\ &= \frac{2}{n^2}\Bigl( -n(n) + 2\bigl(0 + 1 + 2 + \cdots + (n-1)\bigr)\Bigr)\\ &= \frac{2}{n^2}(-n^2 + n^2 - n) = \frac{-2n}{n^2} = -\frac{2}{n}. \end{align*} Thus, $$\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\mathrm{LHS}(n) = \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(-\frac{2}{n}\right) = 0.$$ The right hand sums also converge to $0$, so the integral is equal to $0$.

  3. Use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and find some function $F(x)$ whose derivative is $x$ on $[-1,1]$. Now, $F(x)=x^2$ does not work because $F'(x) = 2x\neq x$. But $\mathcal{F}(x) = \frac{1}{2}x^2$ does work because $\mathcal{F}'(x) = \frac{1}{2}(2x) = x$. That means (by the Constant Function Theorem) that $$\int x\,dx = \frac{1}{2}x^2 + C,$$ (the family of functions that are the antiderivatives of $x$ are the vertical translates of $\frac{1}{2}x^2$) so you can use any one of them (say, the one with $C=0$) to compute $\int_{-1}^1x\,dx$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Consider $f(x)=x$ for x equals 0 to a, it is a right-angled triangle (the blue region in figure below). alt text The area of the square (having sides equal a) is $a^2$. Since there are two identical triangles each filling half the area, the area under the curve of f(x)=x for x=0 to a is $\frac{a^2}{2}$, which is precisely what you get from computing the definite integral, since a definite integral calculates area under the curve.

Another example, consider f(x)=x from a to b, with a>=0. The definite integral from a to b calculated the area of the blue region illustrated below. It can be reduced to the previous case as the area of the bigger triangle from 0 to b minus the area of the smaller triangle from 0 to a. Hence $\frac{b^2}{2} -\frac{a^2}{2}$.

alt text

Perhaps I should also mention, when the area is below the x-axis, such as f(x) for x=a to 0 (a<0), a change of sign is needed, i.e $\frac{-a^2}{2}$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Integration is the opposite of differentiation.

If you differentiate x^2/2 you get x (you bring down the power of 2, which cancels with the 1/2 out front) which means that when you integrate x you must get x^2/2.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.