Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$\newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb Q}$ Let $F=\mathbb Q^{ab} \subset \mathbb C$, i.e. the algebraic numbers. Let $G$ be a finite group of order $n$ and let $\phi: G \rightarrow GL_m(F)$ be a representation. Denote the extension of $\Q$ generated by the entries of $\phi(g)$ for each $g \in G$ by $\Q(\phi)$. Note this is a finite extension. My question is whether or not $\Q(\phi)$ is contained in a cyclotomic extension of $\Q$ or if we can find a change of basis such that $\Q(\phi)$ is wrt to this basis.

Clearly this is the case if $\phi$ is a sum of $1$-dimensional representations, because then the $\phi(g)$ are simultaneously diagonalizable. Since each $\phi(g)$ has only roots of unity for eigenvalues it follows. Other than this rather simple case, I'm at somewhat of a loss. Mainly I'm unsure of how to show something is not contained in a cyclotomic extension. I would guess we would want to show $\Q(\phi)$ has some $\alpha$ in it such that the splitting field of $\alpha$'s minimum polynomial has non-abelian galois group.

share|cite|improve this question
At least Curtis & Reiner (probably most books on representation theory of finite groups) contains the fact that $K=\mathbb{Q}(e^{2\pi i/m})$, where $m$ is the l.c.m. of orders of elements of $G$, is a splitting field of the group algebra of $G$. In other words, the Wedderburn decomposition of $KG$ has summand of the form $M_{n_i}(K)$ only, or all the absolutely irreducible representations can be defined over $K$. This seems to answer your question in the affirmative. – Jyrki Lahtonen May 18 '12 at 5:57
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Firstly, $\mathbb{Q}^{ab}$ customarily denotes the maximal abelian extension of $\mathbb{Q}$. You probably wanted to say $F=\bar{\mathbb{Q}}$, which is the common notation for the algebraic closure.

To answer the actual question, yes any complex representation of a finite group can be defined over a cyclotomic field (and in particular over $\mathbb{Q}^{ab}$, but you probably didn't want to assume that at the beginning). You can first diagonalise one $\phi(g)$ over a cyclotomic extension. Then diagonalise some other $\phi(h)$ over some possibly bigger cyclotomic extension. In doing so, you will destroy the diagonalisation of $\phi(g)$, but that doesn't matter, since the entries of $\phi(g)$ will still lie in a cyclotomic extension (they were in a cyclotomic extension before you diagonalised $\phi(h)$, and you changed the basis by a matrix with entries in a cyclotomic extension). Keep going, until the entire representation is defined over a cyclotomic field by taking care of the elements one by one.

In analysing this process, you will also immediately see that we have defined any given representation over $\mathbb{Q}(e^{2\pi i/n})$, where $n$ is the exponent of the group, i.e. the least common multiple of the orders of all group elements.

share|cite|improve this answer

oops sorry, I missed the change basis part of your question, and I can't delete my answer; please ignore it

This should really be a comment (as you might want to edit the question), but I can't comment yet.

The answer is no. Suppose $n=2$, $G=\{\pm1\}$, and $\phi$ is $$\phi(\pm 1)=\begin{pmatrix} 1&0\\0&\pm1\end{pmatrix}.$$ Let now $$A=\begin{pmatrix} a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}$$ and say $det A=1$, and let $\psi(g)=A\phi(g)A^{-1}$. Then the $1,1$-entry of $\psi(-1)$ is $ad+bc=1+2bc$. However, $bc$ can be any element of $F$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.