# Can a polynomial size CFG over large alphabet describe any of these languages:

Can a polynomial size CFG over large alphabet describe any of these languages:

1. Each terminal appears $0$ or $2$ times
2. Word repetition $\{www^* \mid w \in \Sigma^*\}$ (word repetition of an arbitrary word $w$)

"Polynomial size" Context Free Grammar is defined as Chomsky Normal Form polynomial in $|Σ|$.

References to poly-size CFGs over large alphabets will be appreciated.

EDIT: This is not a homwork. Positive answer can give extension to Restricted read twice BDDs and context free grammars

-
Crosspost in cstheory: cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/3844/… – jerr18 Dec 17 '10 at 11:46

The language described in (2) is not context free. Take the word $a^nba^nba^nb$ for $n$ large enough, and use the pumping lemma to get a word not in the language.
As for (1), consider a grammar in CNF (Chomsky Normal Form) generating that language. Let $n = |\Sigma|$. Consider all $S=(2n)!/2^n$ saturated words containing each character twice. Looking at the tree generating each of these words $w$, there must be a symbol $A_w$ which generates a subword $s_w$ of length between $1/3$ of $2/3$ of the entire word (of length $2n$). Suppose $A_u = A_v$. Then $|s_u| = |s_v|$ and $s_u = s_v$ up to permutation, since otherwise we can replace one occurrence by the other to get a word not in the language.
How many times can a given $A_u$ appear? Equivalently, in how many saturated words does $s_u$ appear, up to permutation, somewhere in the word? Any such word can be obtained from $u$ by permuting $s_u$, permuting the rest of the word, any rotating the result, to a total of $2n|s_u|!(2n-|s_u|)! \leq 2n(2n/3)!(4n/3)!$. Therefore the number of different symbols in the language is at least $$\frac{(2n)!/2^n}{2n(2n/3)!(4n/3)!} = O\left(\frac{c^n}{n^{1.5}}\right),$$ where $c = 9/4\sqrt[3]{2} \approx 1.78583$ (asymptotics courtesy of Wolfram Alpha).
According to Wikipedia, one can transform a grammar $G$ into a CNF grammar of size $O(|G|^2)$. Therefore this language requires exponentially many symbols for any grammar.