Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In his paper "Examples of Calabi-Yau 3-manifolds with complex multiplication", Jan Christian Rohdes claims that the surface $S \subset \mathbb{P}^3$, with variables $(y_2: y_1: x_1: x_0)$, given by the following equation is smooth


He says: "By using partial derivatives of the defining equation, one can easily verify that $S$ is smooth". However, the equation and its partial derivatives seem to vanish at all points with $y_1=x_0=0$. Where am I making a mistake?

Thanks for your help!

share|cite|improve this question
Your mistake is that the partial derivative with respect to $y_1$ is $y_2^3-4y_1^3$, and does not vanish just because $y_1=x_0=0$ . Actually Rhodes is right : his surface $S$ is smooth. – Georges Elencwajg May 15 '12 at 8:25
This is a bit late, but let me point out that the author's family name is Rohde, with no letter 's' in sight. – user64687 May 6 '13 at 19:25

The partial derivative with respect to $y_1$ does not vanish identically when $x_0 = y_1 = 0$.

(It is given by $y_2^3 - 4y_1^3$!)

share|cite|improve this answer

I guess you just want to check your calculations.

The derivative w.r.t. $x_0$ is $x_1^3-4x_0^3$, the one w.r.t. $x_1$ is $3x_1^2 x_0$, the one w.r.t. $y_1$ is $y_2^3-4 y_1^3$ and the one w.r.t. $y_2$ is $3y_2^2 y_1$ and they clearly have only the trivial solution in common.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.