What are the best examples of mathematical induction available at the secondary-school level---totally elementary---that do not involve expressions of the form $\bullet+\cdots\cdots\cdots+\bullet$ where the number of terms depends on $n$ and you're doing induction on $n$?
|
|
Some I can think of off the top of my head:
I'll add more later if I think of any. |
|||||||||
|
|
My favorite induction problem goes like this: Consider a long circular road that has a number of fuel depots along the way. All in all, the depots contains just the right amount of fuel to get your car around. You start with an empty tank. Show that you can always find a depot at which to start so that it's possible to get all the way round. (You can make the road one-way if you like.) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Here is the first example I saw of induction, and I still think it's a beautiful one. Problem: Prove that a $2^n \times 2^n$ sheet of graph paper with one box removed, can be tiled with L-shaped trominos. Proof: For the $n=1$ case, there is nothing to prove: a $2 \times 2$ grid with one box removed is exactly a L-tromino. For $n=2$, consider the $4 \times 4$ grid. You can divide it into four $2\times 2$ grids. The removed box is in one of those four sub-grids, so that sub-grid can be covered with an L-tromino (is an L-tromino, rather). What about the other 3 sub-grids? Put an L-tromino right in the center of the huge grid, which covers them!
Now the remaining part of each of them is a $2\times2$ grid with one box removed. I leave it to you to complete the proof, and teach it to the students as you best see fit. The figures above are from Mathematical Circles: Russian Experience by Dmitri Fomin, Sergey Genkin, and Ilia Itenberg, specifically the chapter on Induction which is written by I.S. Rubanov. The book actually doesn't use a variable $n$, but asks for a $16\times 16$ square, then in the form of a discussion between a teacher and a student works through the $2\times 2$ and $4\times 4$ and $8\times 8$ cases, until it is obvious that we have in fact proved a theorem for any $2^n \times 2^n$ ('It looks like we have a "wave of proofs running along the chain of theorems $2\times2 \longrightarrow 4\times4 \longrightarrow 8\times8 \longrightarrow$ It is quite evident that the wave will not miss any statement in this chain.') As an aside, this is a lovely book with quite a bit of non-trivial mathematics suitable for elementary school and high-school students (though I read in late high school). This theorem and proof are also on the cut-the-knot website: Tromino Puzzle and Golomb's Inductive Proof. |
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
I'd use a visual method to explain the concept before "complicating" it with numbers. Falling dominoes seem intuitive and capture the essence of induction.
(Source: p143 of Book of Proof by Richard Hammack) (You could also go off on a tangent about abstraction in mathematics analogies.) |
||||
|
|
Does proving statements like $f(n) \leq g(n)$ fit your bill? For instance, prove that $2^n \leq 2n!$. |
||||
|
|
|
These come to mind immediately; I may have more later.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
I like the ones that involve division. For instance, prove that $7 \mid 11^n-4^n$ for $n=1, 2, 3, \cdots$ Another example would be perhaps proving that $$(3+\sqrt{5})^n+(3-\sqrt{5})^n$$ is an even integer for all natural numbers $n$. |
||||
|
|
|
I think we did things we already knew to start with, like the formula for triangular numbers, then squares. The binomial coefficients provided examples too. Actually this developed into expressions for the coefficients of power series and generating functions. There is some magic in discovering such things for yourself rather than being told. My maths teacher pointed me in the right direction and let me discover ... |
|||
|
|
|
How about that a graph always has an even number of vertices of odd degree, by induction on the number of edges? But perhaps the counting argument is simpler. Along the same lines: Euler's $F-E+V=2$ formula for graphs. Chromatic polynomials. |
||||
|
|
|
Check this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU60TuGHxe0&t=3m9s. Mathematical induction explained on simple properties of strings. |
|||||
|
|
Sometimes no-examples teach a good deal. Check the following proof that all human beings on Earth right now are the same age: Proof for 1: clearly, in a set with only 1 person all the people in it are the same age Inductive hypothesis: in all the sets with n persons we have that all of them are the same age. Let A be a set with $n+1$ persons, say $A=\{a_1,...,a_n,a_{n+1}\}$, and let $A':=\{a_1,...,a_n\}$ , $A'':=\{a_2,...,a_{n+1}\}$ . The ind. hyp. tells us that all the persons in A' are the same age and all the persons in A'' are the same age, and since $a_2$ belongs to both then all the elements in A are the same age as $a_2$ , ergo: all of the elements in A are the same age. QED. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
At the risk of beating a dead horse, any good book on competition mathematics is sure to have lots of examples at the level you want. Here's one from Putnam and Beyond by Gelca and Andreescu, which demonstrates how recursive definitions can be used to do induction:
The proof is by constructing $g$ and $h$ on increasing subintervals of $\mathbb{R}$, with $a=0$ and $b=1$. Let $g(x)=x f(1)$ on $[-1,1]$, and $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)$ on the same interval. For $n \ge 1$ let $h(x)= -h(2-x)$ on $(2n-1,2n+1)$ and $g(x)=f(x)-h(x)$ on the same interval. Then let $g(x)=-g(-x)$ on $[-2n-1,-2n+1)$ and $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)$ on the same interval. To prove that $g$ and $h$ defined this way satisfy the required properties uses induction. Specifically, assume at each stage, we have $g$ and $h$ defined on $[-2n-1,2n+1]$ with $f=g+h$, $g$ odd, and $h(x)=-h(2-x)$ for $x \in [-2n-3,2n+1]$. It follows directly from the definitions of $g$ and $h$ that $f=g+h$ on $[-2(n+1)-1,2(n+1)+1]$ and that $g$ remains odd and $h(x)=-h(2-x)$ for $x \in [-2(n+1)-3,2n+1]$. Since these intervals cover $\mathbb{R}$ we have $g$ and $h$ defined everywhere with the desired properties. Admittedly, this is a bit harder than what most secondary students would be able to solve, but it is still totally elementary and with some watering down and drawing pictures they could at least understand it. |
|||
|
|
|
The number of diagonals in a convex polygon is $n(n-3)/2$. Proof For $n=3$, the result follows. Suppose true for $n$ and look at $n+1$. By joining vertex $1$ with vertex $3$, we obtain a polygon with $n$ sides. The inductive hypothesis means we have $n(n-3)/2$. diagonals, plus the one we just drew. We only need to add the missing diagonals from $2$ to all other vertices $\neq 1,3$, which accounts to $n-2$ more diagonals. Thus we get $$\frac{n(n-3)}2+n-2+1=\frac{n(n-3)+2(n-1)}{2}=\frac{n^2-n-2}{2}=\frac{(n-2)(n+1)}2$$ and the result follows. |
|||
|
|
|
Suppose that in a group of $2n + 1$ people, for every group of $n$ people there exists one person (which is not one of them) who knows each of them. Here the relation "knows" is symmetric. Then, there exists one person who knows all the other $2n$ people. |
|||
|
|
|
Maybe it would be good to start with something that the students already know is obviously true. For example, you could develop an inductive proof that $2n$ is always even. I think this would make it easy for them to see what the base case, inductive hypothesis and inductive steps mean. For the base case we show our statements holds for the smallest possible $n$. In this case it is $0$ and $2(0)=0$, which is even. For the inductive step we have to show that $2(n+1)$ is even but we get to use the inductive hypothesis: $2n$ is even. Then it's just a matter of the distributive property to get $2n+2$ and the common knowledge that adding $2$ to an even number gets another even number. Other candidates could be anything shown with straightforward structural induction on Peano numbers. |
|||||||||
|






