Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to prove the theorem $\lim_{x\to 0^-}\frac{1}{x^r}=+\infty$ if r is even. So that means I have to show that for any $N>0$ there exists a $\delta >0$ such that if $-x<\delta $ then $\frac{1}{x^r}>N$. First I solved for x in the 'then' statement so I got $x<(\frac{1}{N})^{1/r}$ then multiplied the inequality by -1 so $-x>-(\frac{1}{N})^{1/r}$ then this is the part which I might be wrong; I took the reciprocal of the right hand side of the inequality then I got: $-x<-N^{1/r}$. So if we can now take $\delta =-N^{1/r}$ and hence the theorem is proven?

share|improve this question
1  
Work with positive numbers. Situation is symmetric about $0$, so we only care about $|x|$ anyway. –  André Nicolas May 13 '12 at 18:37
add comment

3 Answers

What one must show is that, for every positive $N$, there exists a positive $\delta$ such that: $$ \forall x\in\mathbb R,\quad-\delta\leqslant x\lt 0\implies 1/x^r\geqslant N. $$ So, fix $N\gt0$. Which $\delta\gt0$ would do the job?

share|improve this answer
add comment

You’re getting your signs a bit confused. The way you’ve set things up, your $x$ is negative, so it’s bound to be less than $\left(\frac1N\right)^{1/r}$; what’s important is that $-x<\left(\frac1N\right)^{1/r}$. Now you can multiply through by $-1$ to get $x>-\left(\frac1N\right)^{1/r}$, an inequality involving two negative numbers. When you take reciprocals, you must do it on both sides of the inequality. Since the two numbers have the same sign, you must also reverse the inequality: $$\frac1x<-N^{1/r}\;,$$ which isn’t very useful. But this last step was unnecessary. Go back and simply set $\delta=\left(\frac1N\right)^{1/r}$: then whenever $0<-x<\delta$ you have $$\frac1{-x}>\frac1\delta=N^{1/r}$$ and therefore $\dfrac1{(-x)^r}>N$. Finally, $r$ is even, so $(-x)^r=x^r$.

share|improve this answer
    
Yeah, I was too focused on getting a value for delta. I'm not very comfortable with assuming a value; but it works anyways. –  Dystopian May 13 '12 at 18:44
add comment

Not getting much into your general strategy to prove the said statement - if $ -(\frac{x}{1})=-x>-(\frac{1}{N})^{\frac{1}{r}}=-(\frac{1}{N^{\frac{1}{r}}})$, than $ -\frac{1}{x} < -(N)^{\frac{1}{r} } $.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.