Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to understand the following proof from my lecture notes for a proposition: Let $A$ be a connected subset of a topological space $X$ and suppose $A \subseteq B \subseteq \overline{A}$. Then B is connected.

The proof is as follows:

If not, then there exists open sets $U, V \subseteq X$ such that $B \cap U$ and $B \cap V$ are disjoint nonempty and $B \subseteq U \cup V $. Then $A \cap U$ and $A \cap V$ are disjoint open subsets of $A$ whose union is $A$. Since A is connected, either $A \cap U$ or $A \cap V$ must be empty; suppose that $A \cap U = \emptyset$ so that $A \subseteq V$. But since $B \subseteq \overline{A}$, every open set meeting $B$ also meets $A$; in particular $U$, (with $U \cap B \ne \emptyset$) meets $A$, a contradiction.

I cant quite graps how we know that: $B \subseteq \overline{A}$ and then subsequently how is it the case that every open set meeting $B$ also meets $A$.

Thanks.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

Let $O$ an open subset which meet $B$, and $x\in O\cap B$. Then $x\in \overline A$, and $O$ is a neighborhood of $x$, hence $O\cap A\neq \emptyset$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.