Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

how to prove that:

$\mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i,Y) \cong \varprojlim \mathrm{Hom}( X_i,Y)$?

Added(05/10/12)

It should be $Y$, instead of $Y_i$, and thanks for the answers.

share|improve this question
2  
By the universal property of the limit, homomorphisms from the inductive limit correspond to projective families of morphisms from the constituents of the limit. (Just like a homomorphism from a coproduct is equivalent to a family/product of homomorphisms from the cofactors). –  Arturo Magidin May 10 '12 at 5:30
    
it should be $Y_i$ –  Jr. May 10 '12 at 5:39
3  
Shouldn't it read $\mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i, Y)$? –  martini May 10 '12 at 5:48
2  
Your indices don't make sense. The first index $i$ on the left is bound by the $\varinjlim$, but the $i$ in $Y_i$ is free; but both indices on the right hand side are bound by the $\varprojlim$ –  Arturo Magidin May 10 '12 at 5:49
2  
Assuming it should be $Y$, the isomorphism you are asking is just a restatement of the universal property of $\varinjlim$: a map from $\varinjlim X_i$ corresponds uniquely to a family of maps from the $X_i$ that respect the inductive structure. Write out what "respect the inductive structure" means and you'll discover that you have a projective family of morphisms. This is completely analogous to the fact that $\mathrm{Hom}(\coprod X_i, Y) \cong \prod\mathrm{Hom}(X_i,Y)$, because given $\{f_i\}$ on the right, it induces a unique $f$ on the left. Same thing here. –  Arturo Magidin May 10 '12 at 5:51
show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

as said in my comment above, I suppose you meant to show $$\mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i, Y) \cong \varprojlim\mathrm{Hom}(X_i, Y),$$ as your indices as written don't make sense.

What Arturo meant is, that we should use the universal property of $\varprojlim$, that is we show that $\mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i, Y)$ has the properties of a limit of $\mathrm{Hom}(X_i, Y)$. For $i \in I$ let $\rho_i\colon X_i \to \varinjlim X_i$ the canonical morphism, we get a map $\rho_{i}^\star\colon \mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i, Y) \to \mathrm{Hom}(X_i, Y)$. For a morphism $f\colon i \to j$ we have an $X_f \colon X_i \to X_j$ an by the properties of the colimit we have $\rho_j \circ X_f = \rho_i$, which gives $\rho_i^\star = X_f^\star \circ \rho_j^\star$ by the functorial properties of $\star$. So the $\rho_i^\star$ interact well with the morphisms in $I$, we now have to show that there are universal in such. So let $\sigma_i\colon Z \to \mathrm{Hom}(X_i, Y)$ maps with $\sigma_i = X_f^\star \circ \sigma_j$ for each morphism $f\colon i \to j$ in $I$. For $z \in Z$ we have a family $\sigma_i(z) \colon X_i \to Y$ of morphisms. If $f\colon i \to j$ we have $\sigma_j(z) \circ X_f = X_f^\star\bigl(\sigma_j(z)\bigr) = (X_f^\star\circ \sigma_j)(z) = \sigma_i(z)$. By the universal property of $\varinjlim X_i$ there is a unique $\phi(z): \varinjlim X_i \to Y$ with $\phi(z) \circ \rho_i = \sigma_i(z)$ for all $i$. This gives a $\phi\colon Z \to \mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i, Y)$ with $\rho_i^\star \circ \phi = \sigma_i$ for all $i$. If $\psi\colon Z \to \mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i, Y)$ also has this property, we have for $z \in Z$ that $\psi(z) \circ \rho_i = \sigma_i(z)$ for all $i$ and by uniqueness of $\phi(z)$ we have $\psi(z) = \phi(z)$. As $z$ was arbitrary, $\phi = \psi$.

So $\mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i, Y)$ has the properties of a limit of $\mathrm{Hom}(X_i, Y)$ and therefore $$\mathrm{Hom}(\varinjlim X_i, Y) \cong \varprojlim\mathrm{Hom}(X_i, Y).$$

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.