Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Problem: Let $(E,\tau_E)$ be a compact space and $(F,\tau_F)$ be a Hausdorff space. Show that a function $f:E\rightarrow F$ is continuous if and only if its graph is compact.

My Work: First assume $(E,\tau_E)$ compact and $(F,\tau_F)$ a Hausdorff space . Assume $f:E\rightarrow F$ continuous. Then certainly $f(E)$ is compact. Then $$\operatorname{graph}(f)\subseteq E\times f(E)\subseteq E\times F.$$ Since the graph is closed ( we know this since $(F,\tau_F)$ Hausdorff and $f$ continouous) and $E\times f(E)$ is compact, as the product of two compact sets, than somehow this should give us that $\operatorname{graph}(f)$ compact. I was thinking the canonical projections would be helpful here but i'm unsure.

As for the other way, I'm unsure. Any help is appreciated.

share|improve this question
    
You are very close in the direction you started. You have shown that the graph is a closed subset of $E\times f(E)$, which is compact. Closed subsets of compact spaces are compact, right? As for the other direction, you know the projection $\pi_F\colon \mathrm{graph}(f)\to F$ is continuous and the projection $\pi_E\colon \mathrm{graph}(f)\to E$ is closed (why?). You should be able to use these facts to get what you want. –  froggie May 10 '12 at 1:16
1  
See also this thread for the other direction you ask about. –  t.b. May 10 '12 at 1:20
    
Another similar but not the same post. I've heard three versions of this question in the last few weeks.. must be pretty popular. –  rschwieb May 10 '12 at 1:32
    
Thanks for the help! –  Mathstudent May 10 '12 at 2:30
    
@Mathstudent How do you know that the graph of $f$ is a closed subset of $E \times f(E)$? –  user38268 May 10 '12 at 10:12
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

$\textbf{Attention Mathstudent:}$ I think you need to assume that $E$ is Hausdorff.

Here are some preliminary thoughts on your problem . I think we are ready to prove the other direction. Recall that if you can show that given any closed set $B$ in $Y$, the preimage under $f$ is also closed then you have proven that $f$ is a continuous function. Now we already know that the canonical projection $\pi_2 : E \times F \longrightarrow E$ is a continuous function. Therefore since $(E \times B) = \pi_2^{-1}(B)$ and $B$ is closed it follows that $(E \times B)$ is a closed subset of $E \times F$. Furthermore we know that $\operatorname{graph}(f)$ is a compact subset of $E \times F$ so consider

$$\operatorname{graph}(f) \cap (E \times B).$$

Now note that $\operatorname{graph}(f) \cap (E \times B)$ is closed in the graph of $f$. Since a closed subspace of a compact space is compact, it follows that

$$\operatorname{graph}(f) \cap (E \times B)$$

is compact. Now we use the following theorem from Munkres:

$\textbf{Theorem 26.6 (Munkres)}$ Let $f : X \rightarrow Y$ be a bijective continuous function. If $X$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff, then $f$ is a homeomorphism.

In our case we have $f$ being $\pi_1|_{\operatorname{graph}(f)}: E \times F \longrightarrow F$, $X = \operatorname{graph}(f)$ and $Y= E$. Now note that $\pi_1$ when restricted to the graph of $f$ becomes a bijective function. To be able to apply your theorem we need that $E$ is Hausdorff (because otherwise the hypotheses of the theorem are not satisfied). Assuming this, the theorem gives that since $\Big(\operatorname{graph}(f) \cap (E \times B)\Big)$ is a compact subset of the graph,

$$\pi_1|_{\operatorname{graph}(f)} \Big(\operatorname{graph}(f) \cap (E \times B)\Big) = f^{-1}(B)$$

is compact. Now we use the assumption again that $E$ is Hausdorff: Since $f^{-1}(B)$ is a compact subset of $E$ that is Hausdorff it is closed so you are done.

$\hspace{6in} \square$

share|improve this answer
    
,hi, I am confused about the two canonical projections, pi1 and pi2, you write "π2:E×F →E is a continuous function. Therefore since (E×B)=π−1(B)", if π−1(B) were to be E×B, shouldn't π2:E×F →F? Thanks –  Bob Mar 16 at 8:43
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.