Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've tried to solve a little problem that goes as follows:

Consider a system of ODEs: $$x'=y-x^3\text{ and } y'=-x^3-y^3$$ And the function $$L(x,y)=\frac{1}{2}y^2+\frac{1}{4}x^4.$$

Now I shall show that $(0,0)$ is not linearly stable, and that $L$ is a Lyapunov function.

I tried to investigate $\frac{dL}{dy}$ and $\frac{dL}{dx}$ and check if this is smaller or greater than $0$ at (0,0). However, these two terms are just $\frac{dL}{dy}=y,\frac{dL}{dx}=x^3$, so it seems we have to solve for $x,y$ explicitly? I'm confused because this looks like one of those exercise where brute-force can be avoided (And we did not deal with non-linear ODEs yet)?

yours, Marie

share|cite|improve this question
You can investigate "the derivative of L with respect to your system", $\nabla L \cdot f(y)$, where $f(y)$ is your system. See the example here. The system is guaranteed to be stable if this derivative is negative definite. – tentaclenorm May 9 '12 at 22:37

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

For $L(x,y)$ to be a Lyapunov function, what you want to do is consider $$\dfrac{dL}{dt} = y \dfrac{dy}{dt} + x^3 \dfrac{dx}{dt} = y (-x^3 - y^3) + x^3 (y - x^3)$$ Do you see why $\dfrac{dL}{dt} \le 0$, with equality only at $(0,0)$? And why $L(x,y) \ge 0$, with equality only at $(0,0)$?

share|cite|improve this answer
Awesome! So for the linear stability, we also have to differentiate w.r.t. $t$, not $x,y$ and hence the two exercises were connected! :) – Marie. P. May 9 '12 at 23:06
Wait - I see how $\frac{dL}{dt}<0$ and $L(x,y)>0$ except equalities at $0$, but if the derivative is negative, then how can the function start at $0$ and then be always greater than zero? – Marie. P. May 9 '12 at 23:16
If you start at $(0,0)$, then obviously you stay there. If you start somewhere else, then as time goes on $L(x,y)$ decreases so you must approach $(0,0)$. – Robert Israel May 10 '12 at 0:34
@Marie.P.: Also, that second equality there is the reason we say that the derivative ${dL\over dt}$ is computed along a solution since we substitute back in the dynamics from the ODE there. – JohnD Dec 14 '12 at 3:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.