Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

UPDATE: I added an answer based off the hints provided by Robert Israel. It may, however, need some adjustment.

I'm trying to solve #18 (pg. 42) from Stein and Sharkarchi's analysis text.

(Before reading, I added the if part (<=) to the question since it didn't seem like much extra work to prove the statements were equivalent).

Problem Statement -- A function is measurable if and only if it is the a.e. limit of continuous functions.

My proof: Assume $\{f_{n}\}\to f\;a.e.\;x$ is a sequence of continuos functions. Then by property 2, each $f_{n}$ is measurable, and by property 4, their $a.e.$ limit is measurable. Thus, $f$ is measurable. Now suppose $f$ is measurable, and further assume $f$ is defined on a set $A\subset\mathbb{R}^{d}$ of finite measure and is infinite only on a set of measure zero. Let $B\subset A$ be the set where $f$ is finite so that $m(A-B)\leq\epsilon\;\forall\epsilon>0$. Then Lusin's Theorem guarantees the existence of a compact set $C\subset B$ where $m(B-C)\leq\epsilon\;\forall\epsilon>0$ and $f_{C}$ uniformly continuous. An application of the Tietze Extension Theorem allows us to construct a new function $F$ such that $F = f_{C}$ on $C$ and is continuous on all of $B$. Define a sequence of functions on $B$ by $f_{n} = F\;\forall\;n=1,2\ldots$ Then $\{f_{n}\}$ is (trivially) a sequence of continuous functions which uniformly converges to $F$ on $B$ (to obtain a non-trivial sequence of continuous functions, one could apply the generalized Stone-Weirstrass Approximation Theorem to $F$). As consequence, $f_{n}\to f\;a.e.\; x\in B$, since $m(B-C)\leq\epsilon$. But the union of two sets of measure zero is again a set of measure zero, so in fact $f_{n}\to\; f\; a.e.\; x\in A$

I'm concerned that my proof strategy is off the mark, particularly since I construct a rather trivial sequence of continuous functions. Secondly, how can I strengthen the theorem by getting rid of the hypotheses of $A$ having finite measure and $f$ being finite? (I managed to make $f$ finite a.e., but I don't think that's strong enough?).

Thanks!

share|improve this question
    
What properties are you referring to? –  AD. May 9 '12 at 16:02
    
They are taken from Stein and Shakarchi's text. Property 2 proves every continuous function is measurable, and property 4 proves every limit of a sequence of measurable functions is measurable (including lim sup/inf, etc.), and by extension these properties being weakened to a.e. –  Taylor Martin May 9 '12 at 16:07
    
Hint: if $m(A) = \infty$, write $A = \bigcup_{n} (A \cap B_n)$ where $B_n$ is a ball of radius $n$. If $|f| = \infty$ on a set of positive measure, consider "cutoff" functions that take the values $\pm n$ where $f = \pm \infty$. –  Robert Israel May 9 '12 at 16:26
    
Robert, Are you suggesting that I apply Lusin's Theorem to the "cutoff" functions $f_{N}$ on the set $A_{N}=\bigcup_{n=1}^{N}\left(A\cap B_{n}\right)\;\forall\;n=1,2,\ldots$? Then since I can construct the continuous sequence of functions converging to $f_{N}$ on $A_{N}$ for each $N$, it must be true in the limit as $N\to\infty$, and therefore true for $f$ on $A$? \\ Also, is the sequence of continuous functions I exhibited by using the Tietze Extension Theorem legitimate? Or do you suspect the authors had something less trivial in mind? –  Taylor Martin May 9 '12 at 17:31
1  
@JTian I suggest that you write the propositions in the text. Most people don't have your book and it is not standard names either. –  AD. May 9 '12 at 20:17

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Here is a tentative solution. Thank you Robert.

Problem Statement: A function is measurable if and only if it is the a.e. limit of continuous functions.

Proof: The reverse direction is trivial (see original post).

To prove the converse, we begin with proving a sequence of weaker statements which lead to the conclusion (since we want to apply certain theorems which require stronger hypotheses on $f$, and also because it significantly simplifies the notational mess that would occur if we had to deal with all exceptional cases at once). First, suppose $f$ is measurable, $f$ is defined on a set $A\subset\mathbb{R}^{d}$ of finite measure, and $f$ is finite on $A$. Then Lusin's Theorem guarantees us the existence of a compact $B\subset A$ where $m(A-B)\leq\epsilon$ for all $\epsilon>0$ and $f_{B}$ is uniformly continuous ($f_{B}$ is the "restriction" of $f$ to $B$; it is not defined on $A$!). An application of the Tietze Extension Theorem allows us to construct a new function $F$ such that $F$ is continuous on all of $A$ and $F=f_{B}$ on $B\subset A$ ($F$ is the continuous extension of $f_{B}$ from the subset $B$ to $A$). There are now many ways to construct a sequence of continuous functions. One trivial example is $\{f_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ where $f_{n}=F\;\forall\;n=1,2,3\ldots$. A less trivial one comes from an application of the Stone-Weierstrass Approximation Theorem which guarantees the existence of a sequence of continuous polynomials which converge uniformly to $F$ on any compact set (take the closure of $A$ if necessary). In any case, we have a sequence of continuous functions $\{f_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ where $f_{n}\to F$ on $A$. And since $F=f_{B}$ on $B$ is equivalent to $F=f$ on $B$, we have that $f_{n}\to f\;a.e.\;x\in A$ since $m(A-B)\leq\epsilon$.

Now weaken the hypotheses slightly by allowing $f$ to be infinite on a set of measure zero. Then we can let $B\subset A$ be the set on which $f$ is finite, where $m(A-B)=0$. Then from the above proof, we see there is a sequence of continuous functions $\{f_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ which converges to $f\;a.e.$ on $B$. Let $C\subset B$ be the subset on which the convergence occurs. Then $f_{n}\to f$ on $(A-D)$ where $D=(B-C)\cup(A-B)$ is the union of two sets of measure zero. Hence, $f_{n}\to f\;a.e.\;x\in A$ since $D$ being the union of two sets of measure zero is again a set of measure zero.

Weakening the hypotheses further, we now allow the possibility of $E$ having non-finite measure, in particular, $E$ can be unbounded. Then $A=\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}A_{n}$ where $A_{n}=A\cap B_{n}$ and $B_{n}$ is a ball of radius $n$ about the origin. Since $\{B_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\nearrow\mathbb{R}^{d}$, for any subset of $A$ you desire $a.e.$ convergence, there exists an $N$ such that an application of the above proofs yield the desired result on $A_{N}$, and letting $N\to\infty$ gives the required conclusion on all of $A$.

Finally, we weaken the hypotheses to the original statement. In particular, we now allow $f$ to be infinite on a set of positive measure. To prove the same result holds, consider "cutoff" functions $g_{n} = f$ on the set where $f$ is finite, and $g_{n}=n$ on the set where $f$ is infinite. Then each $g_{n}$ is measurable, and so the above proofs apply to $g_{n}$ for all $n=1,2,\ldots$ Evidently $g_{n}\to f$ as $n\to\infty$, and so the sequences of continuous functions converging $a.e.$ to each $g_{n}$, also converge to $f$ at points where $f$ is finite, and as $n\to\infty$, to arbitrarily large values at points where $f$ is infinite. We therefore conclude the theorem holds when $f$ is infinite on sets of positive measure, thus completing the proof. (Note, in the final two cases, the index $n$ has nothing to do with the index on sequences of functions; it in fact indexes a collection of sequences of functions). QED

NOTE: I'm a little unsure about the final two cases; I was trying to apply Robert's hints, but I think I'm not being technical enough to offer a rigorous proof. Modifications are welcomed.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.