Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it true that fundamental group of a manifold with boundary cannot be simple? I think I read that during a hurried research run through the basement of Geisel library, but didn't mark the source.

If false please provide a counterexample. If true, is there a "simple" proof or intuitive reason?

share|cite|improve this question
Any closed ball is a manifold with boundary that is also contractible. – Neal May 9 '12 at 1:08
If you have a manifold $X$ with simple fundamental group (like $SO(n), n\geq 3$ which has fundamental group of order $2$), what is to stop you to just consider $X\times [0,1]$? This new space has a boundary and shares its fundamental group with $X$. – Olivier Bégassat May 9 '12 at 1:10
@OlivierBégassat, I don't know what's to stop me from considering the product, I'm an engineer not a mathematician. What's the fundamental group of [0,1] and what results relate the fundamental groups of the factors to that of the product? Would be grateful for any references/links. – alancalvitti May 9 '12 at 1:55
@JasonDeVito, your comment seems to be saying (correct me if I'm misinterpreting) that the fundamental group of a boundary of a manifold can be simple, but does that imply the answer to my original Q? – alancalvitti May 9 '12 at 1:58
Well, the fundamental group of a product is the product of their fundakental groups and an interval is homotopy equivalent to a point so has trivial fundamental group. – Olivier Bégassat May 9 '12 at 1:59

1 Answer 1

up vote 11 down vote accepted

This is false.

In fact, every finitely generated group, simple or not, is the fundamental group of a compact 4-manifold $X$ with boundary $S^3$, a 3 dimensional sphere.

First, it is known that every finitely generated group $G$ is the fundamental group of a compact 4 dimensional manifold $M$. See for example

Now, let $B^4$ be a small open ball in $M$ and consider $X = M - B^4$. Then $X$ is a manifold with boundary $S^3$.

I claim that $\pi_1(X) = \pi_1(M) = G$.

To see this, write $M = X \cup B^4$ and apply Seifert-van Kampen. Using the fact that $X\cap B^4 = S^3$ is simply connected and that $B^4$ is simply connected, we learn that $\pi_1(M)\cong \pi_1(X)\ast_{\pi_1(S^3)} \pi_1(B^4) \cong \pi_1(X)$. Thus, $\pi_1(X) \cong \pi_1(M) = G$ as claimed.

share|cite|improve this answer
thank you, very nice. I can't follow all the details - particularly the subscripted factor in the last line (markup typo?) but seems reasonable and thanks for the refs... topology continues to amaze. – alancalvitti May 9 '12 at 13:13
That subscripted factor refers to the almagamated product of 2 groups:…. The idea is you have two groups G and G' with a "common" subgroup H. Then you first form G*G' which consists of "words" with a "letter" from G follows by one of G', continually alternating. The group operation is concatenation followed by simplifciation. The subscript part is a quotienting out procedure where we move things in the H in G into the corresponding thing in the H in G'. – Jason DeVito May 9 '12 at 13:27
Thanks again. I like geometry, and dislike algebra, and that's a major handicap. – alancalvitti May 9 '12 at 14:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.