Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Do continuous maps necessarily preserve topological invariants? Or is it necessary for the maps to be homeomorphisms? Are there simple examples where continuous maps do not preserve these invariants?

share|cite|improve this question
    
See math.stackexchange.com/q/233657 for an example showing that Hausdorffness (which is a topological property) is not preserved even under a bijective continuous map. – Tom Collinge Feb 17 at 14:00
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Note that there is a continuous map from any topological space to a single point, so no invariant that can distinguish non-points from points will be preserved in general. A homeomorphism will preserve every invariant (by the definition of invariant, as pointed out by lhf).

However, many topological invariants (such as the fundamental group and homology) are preserved by homotopy equivalences, which are not homeomorphisms in general, so there is a middle ground.

share|cite|improve this answer

A topological invariant is usually defined as a property preserved under homeomorphisms.

There are topological properties, such as compactness and connectedness, that are preserved even under continuous functions.

Not all topological properties are preserved under continuous functions. For instance, the number of connected components (the simplest homology) is a topological invariant that is not preserved in general under continuous functions.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.