Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $(x_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ and $(y_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ are two bounded sequences. Show that there exists an increasing sequence of integers $n_k$ so that the subsequences $x_{n_k}$ and $y_{n_k}$ both converge.

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Michael Albanese, RedMushroom, Claude Leibovici, SchrodingersCat, 91500 Dec 30 '15 at 11:17

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Michael Albanese, RedMushroom, Claude Leibovici, SchrodingersCat, 91500
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

My first idea was to multiply the two bounded sequences together and then that is certainly bounded. Then I used bolzano-Weistrass to get a convergent subseqence. I was trying to show that each half of the multiplied subsequence converges. But i'm unsure if this is correct or not. Any help is appreciated. – Mathstudent May 7 '12 at 17:55
Please add your own work to the question, instead of adding it as a comment. – TMM May 7 '12 at 17:57
Ok will do next time. Thanks for the tip. – Mathstudent May 7 '12 at 18:00
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Any bounded sequence (in $\mathbb{R}^n$, presumably) lies in some compact set, so must have a convergent subsequence.

So start with $x_n$, then $x_{n_k} \rightarrow \hat{x}$ along the subsequence $n_k$. Now consider the sequence $y_{n_k}$, by the same considerations, $y_{n_{k_j}} \rightarrow \hat{y}$ along some subsequence $n_{k_j}$. Since $x_{n_k}$ converges, it also converges along the subsequence $x_{n_{k_j}}$, hence you have $x_{n_{k_j}} \rightarrow \hat{x}$, as well, which is what you are trying to show.

share|cite|improve this answer

This assumes that $\{x_n\}$ and $\{y_n\}$ are sequences in $\Bbb R^n$.

Use Bolzano-Weierstrass on $\{x_n\}$ to get a convergent subsequence $\{x_{n_k}\}$. Now look at $\{y_{n_k}\}$. Can you use Bolzano-Weierstrass on this?

Yes, you can, because $\{y_{n_k}\}$ is a subset of the bounded set $\{y_n\}$. Use that to get another convergent subsequence $\{y_{n_{k_l}}\}$ and look at $\{x_{n_{k_l}}\}$...

share|cite|improve this answer
Weierstrass wants to know what you have against him. :-) – Brian M. Scott May 7 '12 at 17:57
@BrianM.Scott If it weren't for him, I wouldn't have to deal with those darn differentiable-nowhere cts functions. – Alex Becker May 7 '12 at 17:59
@Brian Nothing at all. I have added him in. – user21436 May 7 '12 at 17:59

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.