Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose I would like to show that for 2 metric spaces $A,B$, a function $f:A\to B$ and the graph of $f$, $G=\{(a,f(a))\in A\times B|a\in A\}$ that

$f$ is continuous IFF $G$ is closed (with an additional condition for the $(\Leftarrow)$ direction -- $B$ is compact)

My thoughts are

$(\Rightarrow) a_k\to a \implies f(a_k)\to f(a)$, therefore $(a_k,f(a_k))\to (a,b)\implies (a,b)\in A\times B$.

My doubts are that do I need to say something about the product metric? As far as I know there isn't a unique definition for it. Also this "proof" seems to be too simple -- I think it might be lacking in something.

$(\Leftarrow) $ Suppose $a_k\to a$, Then since $G$ is compact, given a sequence $(a_k, f(a_k))$, we can find a subsequence $(a_{k_n}, f(a_{k_n}))$ that converges (I am not sure what this law is, I hope I haven't confused the context and that it is really applicable here.) Since the limit is in $G$, therefore $f(a_{k_n})\to f(a)$ for $a_{k_n}\to a$. Therefore $f$ is continuous.

Again, I think there might be holes in my argument, or perhaps even wrong assumptions.

Please teach me to fix it. Thanks!

share|improve this question
Hint: Metric spaces are Hausdorff so the limit $(a,b)$ is unique, so $b=f(a)$ as wanted. –  Asaf Karagila May 6 '12 at 21:59
Did you mean to assume at the top that $G$ is compact? Compactness of $B$ doesn't imply this. –  Brian M. Scott May 6 '12 at 22:05
You still have at least one thing left to do, because proving a subsequence of the $f(a_k)$ converges to $f(x)$ does not say anything about the original sequence's convergence. –  rschwieb May 6 '12 at 22:10
@BrianM.Scott In that direction, $G$ closed in a compact Hausdorff space gives you $G$ is compact, no? I might have my wires crossed... Oh, n/m, $G$ isn't a subset of $B$, duh :) –  rschwieb May 6 '12 at 22:11
@BrianM.Scott: Actually I was really given that $B$ is compact, not $G$. Does that mean my argument is wrong? –  Allen May 6 '12 at 22:31

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

For the $(\Rightarrow)$ direction, start, as you did, with an arbitrary point $a\in A$ and a sequence $\langle a_k:k\in\Bbb N\rangle$ converging to $a$. Because $B$ is compact, $\langle f(a_k):k\in\Bbb N\rangle$ has a convergent subsequence; say $\langle f(a_{n_k}):k\in\Bbb N\rangle\to b$. Now you want to show that $b=f(a)$ and that the sequence $\langle f(a_k):k\in\Bbb N\rangle$ converges to $b$. We've already used compactness of $B$, so this must be where the assumption that $G$ is closed comes in. Can you take it from here? If not, just ask, and I'll expand this a bit further.

Added: Let $p=\langle a,b\rangle$. You can easily show that that $$\Big\langle\langle a_{n_k},f(a_{n_k})\rangle:k\in\Bbb N\Big\rangle\to p\;.$$ Since the sequence lies in the closed set $G$, we must have $p\in G$, and hence $f(a)=b$. But we're still not quite done, because so far we know only that the subsequence $\langle f(a_{n_k}):k\in\Bbb N\rangle$ converges to $b$, and we need to conclude that $\langle f(a_k):k\in\Bbb N\rangle\to b$. It clearly can't converge to anything else, but it conceivably might not converge. To prove that it does, just show that every subsequence converges to $b$. This does still require a little work.

share|improve this answer
Thank you for writing the answer! I think since $G$ is closed, any convergent sequence in $G$ must have limit in $G$. So $(a_k,f(a_{k}))$ must converge to $(a,f(a))\in G$. Then by the uniqueness of the limit it follows that $f(a)=b$. Is this right? –  Allen May 6 '12 at 22:53
@Allen: Almost, but you need to do a little more work. Let me respond by editing my answer rather than by trying to fit it into a comment. –  Brian M. Scott May 6 '12 at 22:56
Thanks, but at the risk of being really stupid: I am not sure how to prove that every subsequence converges. But the intuitive feeling is that it should follow from $a_k\to a$ and $G$ closed... –  Allen May 6 '12 at 23:39
Take a subsequence of $\langle f(a_k):k\in\Bbb N\rangle$. Use the compactness of $B$ to get a convergent subsequence of the subsequence, say converging to $b'$. Use the same argument that we used before to show that $b'=f(a)$ and hence $b'=b$. (Let me know if you want me to incorporate that into my answer.) –  Brian M. Scott May 6 '12 at 23:42

I remember doing a similar problem where working by contradiction was easier.

Suppose $a_i$ converges to $a$ but $f(a_i)$ does not converge to $f(a)$. Then there exists an $\epsilon>0$ such that for all $N\in \mathbb{N}$, there exists an $i_N>N$ such that $a_{i_N}\notin B(f(a),\epsilon)$.

If $B$ is compact, then there is a subsequence $b_i$ of the $a_{i_N}$ such that $f(b_i)$ converges. Then the sequence $(b_i,f(b_i))$ must converge (since each of its coordinates converge) and since the graph is closed it converges to a point $(b,f(b))$. But then it follows that $b=a$, and so $f(b_i)$ converges to $f(b)=f(a)$, however this is an absurdity because every element of any subsequence of $f(a_{i_N})$ is more than $\epsilon$ from $f(a)$.

Hence, $f$ preserves convergent sequences, and is continuous.

share|improve this answer
THank you, rschwieb! –  Allen May 7 '12 at 7:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.