Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does there exist a continuous function $\: f : \mathbf{R} \to \mathbf{R} \:$ such that for
all real analytic functions $\: g : \mathbf{R} \to \mathbf{R} \:$, for all real numbers $x$,
there exists a real number $y$ such that $\: x < y \:$ and $\: g(y) < f(y) \:$?

share|cite|improve this question
This question has been asked several times over on mathoverflow, and I believe also on this site. Someone who is better than I at searching should be able to find the past answers. – Pete L. Clark May 6 '12 at 22:15
Has the version with "real analytic" replaced with "real entire" also been asked? – Ricky Demer May 6 '12 at 22:16
If by "real entire" you mean "entire, and real on $\mathbb R$", then the interpolation proof provides such a function. – Robert Israel May 6 '12 at 22:23
Well, I would tend to define "real entire" as "expressible (on $\mathbf{R}$) as a globally convergent power series with real coefficients", but I do know that that is equivalent to what you gave. – Ricky Demer May 6 '12 at 22:27
fixed ${}{}{}\:$ – Ricky Demer May 8 '12 at 3:46
up vote 10 down vote accepted

No. Only if you require $g$ or its coefficients to be computable. Suppose there is such an $f$, then we could just pick the points $(n,(1+\sup\{ f(z))|n-1<z<n+1\}))$, for $n=1,2,3\ldots$ and interpolate.

share|cite|improve this answer
How is it proven that real analytic interpolation is possible? (I'm about to edit to impose continuity on $f$.) – Ricky Demer May 6 '12 at 22:08
It's usually done as a corollary of Mittag-Leffler's theorem and the Weierstrass factorization theorem. But see also – Robert Israel May 6 '12 at 22:21

Recently, I was reading Hardy's Orders of Infinity (available here or here):

Godfrey Harold Hardy. Orders of infinity. The Infinitärcalcül of Paul du Bois-Reymond. Reprint of the 1910 edition. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, No. 12. Hafner Publishing Co., New York, 1971. MR0349922 (50 #2415).

The book discusses this result, so I figured it may be worth adding some comments:

Theorem (Poincaré). For any continuous increasing $\phi:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ we can always find a real analytic function $f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ such that $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{f(x)}{|\phi|}=+\infty$.

This was published in the American Journal of mathematics, vol. 14, p. 214. Hardy presents a proof due to Borel, in Leçons sur les séries à termes positifs, p.27:

We may replace $\phi$ with an increasing function $\Phi$ that is always positive, is pointwise larger than $\phi$, and tends to infinity, and proceed to define $f$ and show that $f/\Phi\to\infty$. Take an increasing sequence of numbers $a_n\to\infty$, and another sequence $b_n$ with $$ a_1<b_2<a_2<b_3<a_3<\dots, $$ and define $$ f(x)=\sum_{n\ge 1}\left(\frac x{b_n}\right)^{\nu_n}, $$ where the positive integers $\nu_n$ are strictly increasing, and satisfy $\displaystyle \left(\frac{a_n}{b_n}\right)^{\nu_n}>\Phi^2(a_n)$. Then $f$ is entire and satisfies the required property.

In detail: The series converges because, given any positive $x$, the $n$-th root of the $n$-th term is at most $x/b_n\to 0$. If $x\in[a_n,a_{n+1})$, then $f(x)>(a_n/b_n)^{\nu_n}$, so $$ f(x)>\Phi^2(a_{n+1})>\Phi^2(x). $$ It follows that $f/\Phi^2\ge 1$ for $x\ge a_1$, and since $\Phi(x)\to\infty$, then also $f/\Phi\to\infty$, as wanted.

Hardy mentions this while discussing a result of du Bois-Reymond: Given functions $f,g\to\infty$, positive, and increasing, write $f\succ g$ iff $f/g\to\infty$.

Theorem (du Bois-Reymond). Given any "ascending scale" $(f_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}$, that is, a sequence of functions $f_n:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$, all positive and increasing to infinity, and such that $f_1\prec f_2\prec f_3\dots$, there is a function $f$ that increases faster than any function in the scale, that is, such that $f\succ f_n$ for all $n$.

This result was generalized by several authors, beginning with Hadamard, and eventually led to Hausdorff work on what we now call Hausdorff gaps.

share|cite|improve this answer

Just take $f(x) = \tan(x)$ (defining $f(x) = 0$, say, when $x$ is an integer multiple of $\pi/2$. But this has nothing to do with "growing too fast".

share|cite|improve this answer
(This answer was posted before I added continuity to the question.) – Ricky Demer May 6 '12 at 22:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.