Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $H$ be a Hilbert Space, and $M$ a closed subspace. Is it true that

$H = M \bigoplus M^{\perp}$

Does this hold if $M$ is not closed? Or only if $H$ is finite/infinite dimensional?

share|cite|improve this question
How exactly are you defining $\oplus$? – Nate Eldredge May 5 '12 at 23:57
I hadn't considered this, just the usual Cartesian product of the underlying sets I assumed? My lecturer didn't define it. What do you think? – rk101 May 6 '12 at 0:44
Well, some definitions say you take the completion afterwards. If you don't then it certainly won't be true for non-closed $M$. (For example, if $M$ is dense in $H$ then $M^\perp = 0$.) But if you do, then it will be true. – Nate Eldredge May 6 '12 at 1:54
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Yes, this is true. Here's how you can go about proving this:

  1. Prove that if $N\leqslant M^\perp$ then $M\oplus N$ is closed.
  2. Prove that if $N\leqslant H$ is closed and $N^\perp=0$ then $N=H$.
  3. Conclude that $M\oplus M^\perp$ is closed and $(M\oplus M^\perp)^\perp=0$.
share|cite|improve this answer
SO this is true in both infinite and finite dimensional Hilbert Spaces? What about just Inner product spaces? – rk101 May 5 '12 at 23:39

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.