Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the dimension of the space of $\{A\ {^t\!A}: A\in M(n\times n,\mathbb{R})\}$? I think it should be $n(n+1)/2$ if one knows already the dimension of the special orthogonal group, but I would love to derive the latter from the former.

share|improve this question
It's not clear to me that your set is a vector space. It's contained in the $n(n+1)/2$ dimensional space of symmetric matrices, but, for example, $\pmatrix{0&1\cr1&0\cr}$ isn't in it. –  Gerry Myerson May 3 '12 at 23:40
Ah, you are right. But you have made me realize what I was missing before, I think. It is sufficient for my purposes to just note that I can define a map from the $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ to my set considered as a subset of the symmetric matrices. Thanks! –  Eric Gregor May 3 '12 at 23:45
The space is the same as the set of (symmetric) positive semi-definite matrices. The dimension could be defined as the dimension of the affine hull of the set, which in this case (since $0$ is in the set) is the span of the set. The span of the set is just the set of symmetric matrices, which has the given dimension. –  copper.hat May 4 '12 at 0:52
Talking properly, your set is a cone. –  Martin Argerami May 4 '12 at 1:15
Would you explain this intriguing comment, Martin? If you expanded and wrote an answer I would accept it. –  Eric Gregor May 4 '12 at 1:18

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

A cone is a subset of a vector space such that it is closed under addition and multiplication by non-negative scalars. Here we are in a finite-dimensional setting, which simplifies things a little.

Typically, a cone can be seen as the "positive part" of your space. Canonical examples are $[0,\infty)\subset\mathbb{R}$, $[0,\infty)\subset\mathbb{C}$, and the positive-semidefinite matrices (either real or complex); this last one is your example.

The main property of the cone is that it is convex (i.e. $x,y$ in the cone, $t\in[0,1]$ imply that $tx+(1-t)y$ is in the cone), and so it can be seen as generated (as a convex set) by its extreme points (that is, every point is a convex combination of extreme points). In your case, the extreme points are the scalar multiplies of the projections, i.e. $\lambda A$ with $\lambda\geq0$, $A=A^t=A^2$.

All this said, I have no idea if this helps with your problem!

share|improve this answer
It doesn't, but it's interesting and as good an answer as this question deserves. –  Eric Gregor May 4 '12 at 2:53
Many definitions of cone that I have seen just require $\lambda x$ be in the code when $x$ is in the cone and $\lambda>0$. If $0$ is in the cone, it is sometimes called a pointed cone. That is, convexity is not necessarily part of the definition. Not that it matters here. –  copper.hat May 4 '12 at 3:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.