Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $(a_1,a_2,...,a_n)\in G_1\oplus G_2 \oplus \cdot \cdot \cdot \oplus G_n$. Give a necessary and sufficient condition for $|(a_1,a_2,...,a_n)| = \infty$

I know $|(a_1,a_2,...,a_n)|$ is related to the LCM somehow, but I'm confused on the context of the question.

share|improve this question
2  
The $G_i$ are groups, I suppose? And $|\cdot|$ denotes the order of an element? Hint: If $a_i$ has finite order $o_i$ for each $i$, what can you say about $(a_1,\ldots, a_n)^{o_1\cdots o_n}$? –  martini May 3 '12 at 6:44

3 Answers 3

up vote 1 down vote accepted

For a (multiplicative) group $G$ and $g\in G$, set $|g|=m\gt 0$ if $g^m=1$ and $g^k\neq 1$ for all $k$, $0\lt k\lt m$; and $|g|=0$ if $g$ is not a torsion element.

If $G_1,\ldots,G_n$ are a finite collection of groups, then $$|(g_1,\ldots,g_n)| = \mathrm{lcm}(|g_1|,|g_2|,\ldots,|g_n|).$$ (Prove it; remember that $\mathrm{lcm}(0,n) = 0$ for all $n$).

More generally, if $G$ is a group, $g_1$ and $g_2$ are two elements that commute, and $\langle g_1\rangle\cap\langle g_2\rangle = \{1\}$, then $|g_1g_2| = \mathrm{lcm}(|g_1|,|g_2|)$: since $g_1$ and $g_2$ commute, then $(g_1g_2)^n = g_1^ng_2^n$. If $(g_1g_2)^k = 1$, then $g_1^kg_2^k=1$, so $g_1^k = g_2^{-k}\in\langle g_1\rangle\cap\langle g_2\rangle=\{1\}$, so $g_1^k = g_2^k = 1$, hence $|g_1|$ divides $k$, and $|g_2|$ divides $k$.

share|improve this answer

Set $a=(a_1,\cdots,a_n)$ to be an arbitrary element of $H=\bigoplus_i G_i$ and $e=(e_1,\cdots,e_n)$ the identity. Note that each $e_i$ is the identity of the direct summand $G_i$. Now some thoughts to ponder:

  • $a^m=e$ is true if and only if $a_i^m=e_i$ for each $i=1,2,\cdots,n$.
  • $a_i^m=e_i$ is true if and only if the order of $a_i$ (in $G_i$) divides $m$ or $a_i=e_i$.
  • If the order of every $a_i$ divides $m$, then $a_i^m=e_i$ for each $i$.
  • An element of $a\in H$ for which $a^m=e$ for some $m\in\Bbb Z$ must have finite order. (Why?)
  • There is an $m\in\Bbb Z$ that is divisible by each $a_i$'s order. (Multiply, take the LCM, etc.)

If each $a_i$ has finite order, the above reasoning tells us $a$ has finite order too. Now, suppose at least one of the $a_i$'s has infinite order. Can $a\in H$ have finite order? (Assume it does and see what happens...)

Finally, there are precisely $n$ conditions on the table: whether or not $a_i$ has finite order, separately for each $i$. What is sufficient for $a$ to have infinite order, in terms of the $a_i$'s orders? And then what is necessary for $a$ to have infinite order? So then what can we say is both necessary and sufficient?

share|improve this answer

I think the required answer is that $(g_1, g_2, ..., g_n)$ has infinite order if and only it at least one such $g_i$ has infinite order in the corresponding $G_i$.

If each $g_i$ had finite order in the corresponding $G_i$ then $(g_1, g_2, ..., g_n)$ would have finite order in $G$ (have a think about this).

Conversely if the order of $(g_1, ..., g_n)$ is finite then each $g_i$ has a (finite) power giving the identity in the corresponding $G_i$. This tells you that all $g_i$'s have finite order.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.