Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm attemtping to solve this problem:

Suppose a shot is fired at a circular target. The vertical and the horizontal coordinates of the point of impact (taking the center of the target as origin) are independent random variables, each distributed according to the standardized normal distribution.

a. Write down the PDFs of the two coordinates.
b. Write down the joint PDF of the coordinates of the point of impact.
c. What is the PDF of the radius of the point of impact $r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$ ? Show all steps you used to derive this expression.
Hint: you can use the CDF method for finding the PDF of a transformed RV.
d. What is the probability that the point of impact will land in the ring of radii 2-3?

MY attempt at a solution:

a) P.D.F. of x is: $$\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}$$ P.D.F. of y is: $$\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}e^{-\frac{y^2}{2}}$$

b) joint PDF is: PDF(x) * PDF(y) = $$\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}e^{-\frac{y^2}{2}} * \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}} = 2\pi^{-1}e^{\frac{-(x^2 + y^2)}{2}} $$

c) this is where I'm getting hung up on...

So the C.D.F. of a std. normal R.V. $x$ is:

$$\phi (x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}\int e^{\frac{-t^{2}}{2}}dt$$

correct?

since $r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$ is given, then is the CDF of $r$ just $$\phi (r) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}\int e^{\frac{-r^{2}}{2}}dr$$ And then would the PDF of the radius just be the first derivative of this?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Note that you have the pdf of the standard normal not quite right, or at least not consistently right. The constant in front should be $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}$. So the constant in front of the joint density is $\frac{1}{2\pi}$.

Let random variable $R$ denote the distance to the origin. Then $R=\sqrt{X^2+Y^2}$. We want the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of $R$, so we want $P(R\le r)$. Clearly this is $0$ for $r \lt 0$. So from now on assume $r\ge 0$. We have $$P(R \le r)=\iint_{D_r} \frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2}dx\,dy,$$ where $D_r$ is the disk of radius $r$, centre the origin. We need to evaluate this integral.

To do this, change to polar coordinates. (If that has been forgotten, look back to your several variable calculus course.) Because the letter $r$ is already taken, I will use $t$ for the polar coordinate distance to the origin. Let $x=t\cos\theta$, $y=t\sin\theta$. The integral becomes $$\int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^r \frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-t^2/2}t\,dt\, d\theta.$$ The integration is straightforward. The inner integral is $\frac{1}{2\pi}\left(1-e^{-r^2/2}\right)$, and for the outer integral you just multiply by $2\pi$, getting $1-e^{-r^2/2}$.

Now we have the cumulative distribution function of $R$. The rest follows without much trouble. For (c), differentiate. For (d), if the cdf is $F_R(r)$, we want $F_R(3)-F_R(2)$.

share|improve this answer
    
So I think I'm starting to grasp this... We're looking for W (or our target radius) such that W is less than w(or the radius of the larger disk), because, in this way, we can ensure that our shot hits inside the disk, correct? Therefore, the double integral serves to get the area of the disk(outer integral), and then the area in which the shot landed inside the disk(inner integral). Is this a correct assumption? –  gfppaste May 3 '12 at 3:50
    
It takes a while, the stuff is not easy, you have to get fully comfortable with the notion of random variable. And then there are little technical tricks needed, like polar coordinates here. By the way, the answer to (d) would be the integral over the annulus (ring) going from $2$ to $3$, though I get to it a slightly different way later. The real point is that we want the cumulative distribution function of $W$. I called it $W$ not $R$, because wanted to save $r$ for polar coordinates. Maybe should not have. Remember, caps for random variables, always. –  André Nicolas May 3 '12 at 3:54
    
Definitely should use $R$. –  Did May 3 '12 at 5:24
    
@Didier: Was torn. Use $r$ for both? Poor hygiene. Use $R$ and $r$? But polar had $r$ first. However, have changed, maybe leaving a few typos behind. –  André Nicolas May 3 '12 at 5:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.