Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm having trouble understanding this question.

We have a path $h$ in $X$ from $x_0$ to $x_1$ and $\bar{h}$ its inverse path. Then a map $\beta_h:\pi_1(X,x_1)\to \pi_1(X,x_0)$ defined by $\beta_h[f]=[h\circ f\circ \bar{h}]$, for every path $f$ in $X$.

The question is to show that $\beta_h$ depends only on the homotopy class of $h$.

Firstly, it says for every path $f$ in $X$, but surely $f$ has to be a loop or you can't form $[h\circ f\circ \bar{h}]$?

And also, I don't understand why it depends on the homotopy class of $h$, when $[h\circ f\circ \bar{h}]$ is the path going from $x_0$ to $x_1$, around $f$, then back to $x_0$, why does the homotopy class of $h$ matter? In general I don't think I fully understand what this map $\beta_h$ is and would like someone to help me out. Thanks

share|cite|improve this question
They are asking you to show that only the homotopy class of $h$ matters. That is, that if $h\sim k$, then $[h\circ f\circ \overline{h}] = [k\circ f \circ\overline{k}]$. So they are not saying the homotopy of $h$ matters, they are saying you get the same result by replacing $h$ with any path that is homotopic to $h$. – Arturo Magidin May 2 '12 at 16:19
ahh, that explains my confusion. Thanks! – 09867 May 2 '12 at 16:28

This is effectively an extended comment.

The question is for every path $h$, not $f$. As $[f] \in \pi_1(X, x_1)$, $f$ is a loop in $X$ based at $x_1$, not a path from $x_0$ to $x_1$.

Instead of writing $h\circ f\circ\bar{h}$ you should write $h\cdot f\cdot\bar{h}$ because you are not composing the maps $h$, $f$, and $\bar{h}$, which is what the symbol $\circ$ is usually reserved for. Also, when using composition, we work right to left (i.e. $f\circ g\circ h$ means apply $h$, then apply $g$, then apply $f$), but with concatenation of paths we work left to right (i.e. $f\cdot g\cdot h$ means travel along the path $f$, then the path $g$, then the path $h$).

As Arturo pointed out, you need to show that if $h$ and $k$ are homotopic paths from $x_0$ to $x_1$, then $h\cdot f\cdot\bar{h}$ and $k\cdot f\cdot\bar{k}$ are homotopic loops based at $x_0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.