Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know that by Roy's identity, the Marshallian demand for a good (i) is $x^*_i = -\frac{V_i}{V_y}$, where $V(Y,P)$ is the indirect utility function, $V_i=\frac{\partial V}{\partial P_i}$, and $V_y=\frac{\partial V}{\partial Y} $.

I also know that a monotonic increasing transformation means strictly increasing. How do I go about proving that Roy's identity holds if the utility function is subjected to a monotonic increasing transformation?

I have shown that Roy's identity holds, but without the "montonic increasing transformation" condition. How do I put it in?

share|improve this question

migrated from economics.stackexchange.com May 1 '12 at 19:56

This question came from our site for professional and academic economists and analysts.

    
I've edited your question so that it is readable, but I'd recommend just looking this up. When posting (as here and in your other question), please be sure to define things (e.g. notice how I specified for you what V(), $V_i$ and so on mean. Otherwise your reader is left to guess, and most people won't have the patience for that. –  Jason B Nov 14 '11 at 4:34

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let $W$ be a monotonic increasing transformation of $V$, i.e., $W=G.V$ for some strictly increasing function $G$. You have to show that, given Roy's identity holds for $V$, it also holds for $W$. But $W_i=G'(V(Y,p)).V_i$ and $W_i=G'(V(Y,P)).V_y$, so that $x*=(-)V_i/V_y=(-)W_i/W_y$, which is what you needed to show. $\square$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.