Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $s$ be a non-negative integer and $$H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) = \{f \in L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) : \frac{\partial^{\alpha}}{\partial x^{\alpha}}f \in L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\text{ for all $\alpha$ with $|\alpha| = \alpha_{1} + \cdots + \alpha_{n} \leq s$}\}$$ where the derivatives are to be interpreted in the sense of distributions. If $s > \frac{n}{2}$, to show that each $u \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ is bounded and continuous, why does it suffice to show that $\widehat{u}(\xi) \in L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

By the Fourier inversion formula, $$u(x) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \hat{u}(\xi) e^{i x \cdot \xi} ~d\xi,$$ from which it certainly follows that $u(x)$ is both bounded and continuous if $\hat{u} \in L^1(\mathbb{R}^n)$ (note that $\hat{u}$ is automatically continuous). By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, $$\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} |\hat{u}(\xi)| ~d\xi \leq \left( \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} (1 + |\xi|)^s |\hat{u}(\xi)|^2 ~d\xi\right)^{1/2} \left( \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} (1 + |\xi|)^{-s} ~d\xi \right)^{1/2} < \infty$$ when $s > n/2$, so the result follows.

share|cite|improve this answer
In fact $u$ is not only bounded but vanishes at infinity, thanks to the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma. – Nate Eldredge May 1 '12 at 3:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.