Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $I=[0,1]$ be the unit interval, viewed as a topological subspace of the real line $R$. Let $I_o=\left\{0,1 \right\}$ be the boundary of $I$. Then denote by $I/{I_o}$ the topological space defined by taking $I$ and shrinking $I_o$ to a point $a^*$ and the topology being the identification topology.

I read the statement "a basis for the open sets of $I/I_o$ containing $a^*$ is the totality of images of the sets of the form $[0,\epsilon) \cup (1-\epsilon,1]$".

How can we see that? Thanks :-)

share|cite|improve this question
Do you know what is meant by the term identification topology? – Brian M. Scott Apr 30 '12 at 21:22
I know the definition... – Manos May 1 '12 at 1:47
Can you match it up with Matt's sketch? – Brian M. Scott May 1 '12 at 1:51
I can understand Matt's sketch. What i don't see is why these sets form a basis. E.g. if $O$ is an open set of $I/I_o$ containing $a^*$, then its inverse image in $I$ must be open and contain $I_o$. The sets $[0,\epsilon) \cup (1-\epsilon]$ are certainly open and contain $I_o$. But why any pre-image of $O$ can be described as the union of these sets? I must be missing something... – Manos May 1 '12 at 12:27
If $O$ is an open nbhd of $a^*$ in $I/I_o$, the pre-image of $O$ must be an open set $V$ in $I$ containing $I_o$. $0\in V$, and $V$ is open, so $[0,\epsilon_0)\subseteq V$ for some $\epsilon_0>0$. Similarly, $(1-\epsilon_1]\subseteq V$ for some $\epsilon_1>0$. Let $\epsilon=\min\{\epsilon_0,\epsilon_1\}$; then $[0,\epsilon)\cup(1-\epsilon,1]\subseteq V$. Thus, $O$ is an open nbhd of $a^*$ iff its pre-image contains a set of the form $[0,\epsilon)\cup(1-\epsilon,1]$, which is exactly the claim that you quoted. – Brian M. Scott May 1 '12 at 17:22
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Like this:

enter image description here

share|cite|improve this answer
That ought to do the trick! – Brian M. Scott Apr 30 '12 at 21:33
@BrianM.Scott ; ) ${}{}{}{}$ – Rudy the Reindeer Apr 30 '12 at 21:33

This is not really an answer, not maybe even a hint, but something to ponder about to get a starting motivation for identification topologies.

Consider the function $$ f(x)=\sin(2\pi x). $$ It is continuous on $I$ and $f(0)=f(1)$ so it certainly defines a function on $I/I_o$. It would be nice if $f(x)$ remained continuous as a function on $I/I_o$, but in order for that to make sense we have to endow $I/I_o$ with a topology.

Such a topology would have the property (by the continuity request for $f(x)$) that the subsets $$ A_\epsilon=\{z\in I/I_o\text{ such that }|f(z)|<\epsilon\} $$ are open. Can you figure out what these sets $A_\epsilon$ are, concretely?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.