Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%B6wenheim%E2%80%93Skolem_theorem ), it says:

In mathematical logic, the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem, named for Leopold Löwenheim and Thoralf Skolem, states that if a countable first-order theory has an infinite model, then for every infinite cardinal number κ it has a model of size κ.

What does the "size" of a model referring to (or mean)? Edit: If it is referring to the cardinality of a model (set), how do you get the cardinality of one model (-> It's synonymous with interpretation, right?)? What is inside the model, then? I mean, it seems sensical to define a model of a language, as a language has some constant numbers and objects, but defining a model of a single object - a number - seems nonsensical to me. What is inside the model of an infinite number?

Thanks.

share|improve this question
    
The cardinality of the underlying set. –  plm Apr 30 '12 at 8:03
    
@plm I edited the question.. can you help me more? Thanks. –  user30272 Apr 30 '12 at 8:28
    
The way this question is phrased shows a lot of confusion. I think what is needed is not just straightening out some particular error, but rather learning the definitions from the beginning. –  Michael Hardy Apr 30 '12 at 15:38

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Each model has a set of individuals. The size of the model is the cardinality of this set.

share|improve this answer
    
So, what are the individuals? Isn't an infinite number a sole individual? –  user30272 Apr 30 '12 at 8:29
    
I don't know if this is the source of your confusion, but the word "it" towards the end of your Wikipedia quote refers to the countable first-order theory, not to the infinite cardinal number. "It has a model of size $\kappa$" means that the theory has a model of size $\kappa$, i.e., a model whose underlying set is a set of cardinality $\kappa$. –  Ted Apr 30 '12 at 8:46
    
@Ted Thanks - that's where I got confusion... stupid me... –  user30272 Apr 30 '12 at 9:25

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.