A coarser topology has more compact sets. Is this claim easy to verify? An if so, how can we prove it?
|
|
More accurately, a coarser topology has no fewer compact sets. Consider the discrete and indiscrete topologies on $\{0,1\}$, for instance: the latter is strictly coarser than the former, but they both have exactly the same compact sets, namely, $\varnothing,\{0\},\{1\}$, and $\{0,1\}$. The claim is trivial to verify when it’s stated properly:
To prove this, suppose that $K\subseteq X$ is $\tau$-compact, and let $\mathscr{U}$ be a cover of $K$ by $\tau'$-open sets. Then $\mathscr{U}\subseteq\tau$, so $\mathscr{U}$ is also a $\tau$-open cover of $K$, and as such it has a finite subcover $\mathscr{V}$. Thus, $K$ is $\tau'$-compact. $\dashv$ |
|||
|
|
|
Intuitively, reducing the number of open sets in existence reduces the number of open covers for the space, making it harder to find an open cover without a finite subcover. Consider any space $X$ of infinite cardinality: in the trivial topology, every subset is compact. In the discrete topology, only finite subspaces are compact. |
|||
|
|
