Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ is a random sample from the $\Gamma(k,\lambda)$ distribution where $\lambda$ is unknown and $k$ is a positive integer and known. How can I find $$E\left[\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2}{(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i)^2}\right] \>?$$

share|improve this question
    
I think the formula is much more readable without the \displaystyle's, so I removed them. In particular, the title took up too much space on the front page when it used them. However, I suppose if you really want to add it back into the body of the question only, that would be okay. –  Zev Chonoles Apr 29 '12 at 2:36
    
I think the $\lambda$ will cancel from the numerator and the denominator, so the answer will not depend on $\lambda$. –  Michael Hardy Apr 29 '12 at 2:39

2 Answers 2

up vote 14 down vote accepted

I will assume $X_i$ be independent.

Using identity, for $a>0$, $$ \frac{1}{a^2} = \int_0^\infty t \mathrm{e}^{-a t} \mathrm{d} t $$ Rewrite the expectation as follows: $$ \begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{E}\left( \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2}{\left(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i \right)^2} \right) &=& \int_0^\infty t \cdot \mathbb{E}\left(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2 \cdot \exp\left(-t \cdot \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\right) \right) \mathrm{d} t \\ &=& n \int_0^\infty t \cdot \mathbb{E}\left(X_1^2 \cdot \exp\left(-t \cdot \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\right) \right) \mathrm{d} t \\ &=& n \int_0^\infty t \cdot \left(\mathcal{M}_X(-t)\right)^{n-1} \cdot \mathcal{M}^{\prime\prime}_X(-t) \mathrm{d} t \\ &=& n \int_0^\infty t \cdot \left(1+\frac{t}{\lambda}\right)^{-k (n-1)} \cdot \frac{k(k+1)}{\lambda^2} \left( 1+ \frac{t}{\lambda}\right)^{-2-k} \mathrm{d} t \\ &\stackrel{\color\maroon{t \to \lambda u}}{=}& n k (k+1) \int_0^\infty \frac{t}{(1+t)^{k n +2}} \mathrm{d} t \\&\stackrel{t \to \frac{1-s}{s}}{=}& n k (k+1) \int_0^1 (1-s) s^{k n-1} \mathrm{d} s = n k (k+1) \left( \frac{1}{n k} - \frac{1}{n k+1} \right)\\&=& {\color\maroon{\frac{k+1}{k \cdot n +1}}} \end{eqnarray} $$ where $\mathcal{M}_X(t)$ denotes the moment generating function of the $\Gamma(k,\lambda)$ distribution.

share|improve this answer
    
This is excellent. Maybe you could add an explanation about why the last integral is $1/(kn(kn+1))$ (possibly through the change of variable $s=1/(1+t)$ and a Beta identity). Upvoted anyway. –  Did Apr 29 '12 at 8:48
1  
@Didier Thanks for the feedback and upvote. I have expanded evaluation of the integral per your suggestion. It's better this way. –  Sasha Apr 29 '12 at 14:56
1  
(+1) That's clever, Sasha. –  cardinal Apr 29 '12 at 16:04

Sasha gives a very nice answer. Here is an alternative using standard relationships between distributions. I, too, will assume that the $X_i$ are independent.

Write $\newcommand{\Beta}{\mathrm{B}}Y_i = \frac{X_i}{X_i + \sum_{i\neq j} X_j}$.

Then, $Y_i \sim \mathrm{Beta}(k,(n-1)k)$ since $X_i \sim \Gamma(k,\lambda)$ and $\sum_{i \neq j} X_j \sim \Gamma((n-1)k,\lambda)$ and the latter two are independent.

By linearity of expectation and the fact that each $Y_i$ has a common distribution, we have $$ \mathbb E\left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2}{(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i)^2}\right) = n \mathbb E Y_1^2 \>. $$

But, $$ \mathbb E Y_1^2 = \frac{1}{\Beta(k,(n-1)k)} \int_0^1 y^2 y^{k-1} (1-y)^{nk-k-1} \,\mathrm dy = \frac{\Beta(k+2,(n-1)k)}{\Beta(k,(n-1)k)} = \frac{k+1}{n(nk + 1)} \>. $$

So, $$ \mathbb E\left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2}{(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i)^2}\right) = \frac{k+1}{nk + 1} \>. $$

share|improve this answer
4  
Wow! No less than two good solutions to a same question... What is going on here? :-) –  Did Apr 29 '12 at 16:27

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.