# Proving continuity of $f$

Here is a problem I encountered some time back: Suppose $f$ is bounded for $a\leq x\leq b$ and for every pair of values $x_1$ and $x_2$ with $a\leq x_1\leq x_2 \leq b$, $f(\frac{1}{2}(x_1+x_2))\leq \frac{1}{2}(f(x_1)+f(x_2))$. Prove that $f$ is continuous for $a<x<b$.

I tried to solve it but I could not really come with anything...

Here's an attempt.The idea is not due to me but to a friend;

By the condition given, $f(\frac{2x+2\delta}{2})\leq \frac{1}{2}(f(x+2\delta)+f(x))$,i.e. $f(x+\delta)-f(x)\leq \frac{1}{2}f(x+2\delta)-f(x)$ and in this manner, $f(x+\delta)-f(x)\leq \frac{1}{2}f(x+2\delta)-f(x)\leq \frac{1}{2^2}(f(x+4\delta)-f(x))\leq$

$\dots \dots \dots \dots$

$\frac{1}{2^n}(f(x+2^n\delta)-f(x))$ where $a<x+2^n\delta<b$

As $\delta\to 0$,$f(x+2^k\delta)\to f(x)$ for $k=1,2,\dots n$ i.e. $f$ is continuous in the interval $(a,b)$.

I tried posting this flawed attempt on Aops , but no one has suggested how to finish off the proof using what I used.I will be happy if someone could suggest something.Thanks!

-

Functions satisfying the inequality $$f\Bigl(\frac{x_1+x_2}2\Bigr)\le\frac{f(x_1)+f(x_2)}2$$ are called midpoint convex. This is a slightly weaker condition than convexity. Continuous midpoint convex functions are convex. A beatiful result due to Sierpinski is that Lebesgue measurable midpoint convex functions are convex.

To prove that a bounded midpoint convex is continuous, argue by contradiction. Supose $f$ is discontinuous at $x_0\in(a,b)$. Without loss of generality we may assume $x_0=0$, $f(x_0)=0$.

First step. There exists a sequence $\{x_n\}\subset(a,b)$, such that $\lim_{n\to\infty}x_n=0$ and $\lim_{n\to\infty}f(x_n)=m\ne0$. We may assume that $m>0$.

Second step. The sequence $\{2\,x_n\}$ also converges to $0$ and $$f(x_n)=f\Bigl(\frac{0+2\,x_n}2\Bigr)\le\frac{f(0)+f(2\,x_n)}2\implies f(2\,x_n)\ge2\,f(x_n)\implies\liminf f(2\,x_n)\ge2\,m.$$ Iteration shows that $$\liminf f(2^k\,x_n)\ge2^k\,m,$$ which is impossible since $f$ is bounded.

You can find this and much more in this book.

-
Why can you assume that $\lim_{n \to +\infty} f(x_n)$ exists? – Siminore Apr 28 '12 at 7:56
@Siminore $\{f(x_n)\}$ is bounded, so it has a convergent subsequence. If the limit of all its convergent subsequences where $0$, then the whole sequence would converge to $0$. – Julián Aguirre Apr 28 '12 at 8:08
Sorry, I was thinking of the general case for mid-convex functions. – Siminore Apr 28 '12 at 8:13
Why can we assume that $x_0=0$ and $f(x_0)=0$?I have had little or no exposure to convergent sequences.I'd probably revisit this after I gain enough background to appreciate this. – Eisen Apr 28 '12 at 8:35
Consider $g(x)=f(x+x_0)-f(x_0)$. $g$ is midpoint convex, bounded and $g(0)=0$. $f$ is continuous in $x=x_0$ if and only if $g$ is continuous in $x=0$. – Julián Aguirre Apr 28 '12 at 9:17

More generally I want to show that If $f$ is a convex function on an open interval $I$ then $f$ is continous: $f$ is said to be convex on $I$ if $\forall a,b\in I$ and every $t\in(0,1)$, if $f$ satisfies $$f(tb+(1-t)a)\le tf(b)+(1-t)f(a).$$

Now for $a=b$, the definition says nothing. If $a<b$,then $$a<tb+(1-t)a<b;$$ and conversely, for each $x\in (a,b)$ we can write $x=tb+(1-t)a$ by taking $t=(x-a)/(b-a)$, so $1-t=(b-x)/(b-a)$. Thus the following is a simple restatement of of the definition:

Proposition ONE.

Suppose that $f:I\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, then $f$ is convex iff $\forall a,b$ and $a<x<b$ we have $$f(x)\le \frac{x-a}{b-a}f(b)+\frac{b-x}{b-a}f(a).$$ And now try to prove this one by using the previous discussion:

Proposition TWO.

If f is a convex function on an interval $I$ and $a<b<c\in I,$ then $$f(x)\ge\frac{x-a}{b-a}f(b)+\frac{b-x}{b-a}f(a) \;\; \forall b<x<c$$ and $$f(x)\ge\frac{c-x}{c-b}f(b)+\frac{x-b}{c-b}f(c) \;\; \forall a<x<b.$$

Now the Final Claim

A convex function on an open interval is continous.

Proof

If $b\in I$ , then there exist $a$ and $c\in I$ with $a<b<c$. Then the last two proposition give the inequalities $$\frac{x-a}{b-a}f(b)+\frac{b-x}{b-a}f(a)\le f(x)\le \frac{x-b}{c-b}f(c)+\frac{c-x}{c-b}f(b)\;\; \forall b<x<c$$ from which it follows that $$f(b+)=f(b).$$ Similarly $$\frac{c-x}{c-b}f(b)\le f(x) \le \frac{x-a}{b-a}f(b)+\frac{b-x}{b-a}f(a) \;\; \forall a<x<b$$ which gives $$f(b-)=f(b).$$ Thus $f$ is continuous at $b$,$b$ was arbitrary so $f$ is continuous on $I$,in your case $t=1/2.$

-