Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $X$ is a Hilbert space and $A$ is an unbounded self-adjoint operator on $X$, is it necessarily that $A^2$ is self-adjoint as well?(admittedly, $A^2$ is densely defined)

share|cite|improve this question
How do you define "self-adjoint" for an operator on a Banach space? – Robert Israel Apr 27 '12 at 3:11
Dunno if this is standard, but you could try to extend the definition by analogy with the SVD. Say that $A:X \rightarrow X$ is "self adjoint" if there exists a bijective isometry $U:X \rightarrow X$ and a multiplication operator $\Sigma:X \rightarrow X$ such that $A=U \Sigma U^{-1}$. – Nick Alger Apr 27 '12 at 5:37
@NickAlger, it is indeed nonstandard (if only for the reason that there is no standard notion of "multiplication operator" on a Banach space). – leslie townes Apr 27 '12 at 6:21
Isn't there a theorem that for every Banach space $X$, there exists a topological vector space $S$ such that $X$ is equivalent to a subspace of $B(S)$ (the space of bounded continuous functions on $S$ characterized by the sup-norm)? In that case one might try using multiplication operators on $B(S)$ where they can be unambiguously defined.. – Nick Alger Apr 27 '12 at 22:32
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Yes. More generally whenever $A$ is closed and densely defined operator on Hilbert space, the operator $A^* A$ is also closed and densely defined, and in fact is self-adjoint. (Wikipedia calls this von Neumann's theorem but I do not think this is a standard name for it.)

As plausible as this sounds, it is highly nontrivial. (If you think a little bit about what is actually being asserted, it is far from obvious why the domain of $A^* A$ must include even one nonzero vector, let alone be dense.)

For the details of this and a great deal more on unbounded operators, consult your local library. Any textbook that treats unbounded operators on Hilbert space from a mathematically coherent point of view (and not simply to motivate applications to physics or some non-analysis-oriented field) should include a proof. It is key, for example, in constructing the polar decomposition of a closed operator.

There is also a functional calculus for unbounded self-adjoint operators of which this discussion is a very special case (if $f$ is any real-valued function on $\mathbb{R}$ one can, with a great deal of work, give meaning to a self-adjoint operator $f(A)$ in a way that respects the usual algebra of functions, and in particular, in a way that assigns to $f(x) = x^2$ the operator $A^2$).

A standard reference for this kind of thing is Volume 1 of Reed and Simon's "Methods of modern mathematical physics" but many other books cover it too. The Wikipedia entry for unbounded operator is also worth a look (although much of the mathematical internet's treatment of unbounded operators is nonrigorous, it is an OK start).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.