Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $Y = X \backslash Z(f)$ be a quasi-affine variety for some affine variety $X$, and let $p \in Y$. I'd like to prove that $T_p Y \cong T_p X$.

I have the following definition of $T_p X$:

If $A$ is a $k$-algebra and $\phi : A \to k$ a $k$-algebra homomorphism, then a $k$-linear map $D : A \to k$ is a 'derivation centred at $\phi$' if $D(fg) = \phi(f)D(g) + D(f)\phi(g)$ for all $f,g \in A$. Let $\mathrm{Der}(A,\phi)$ be the vector space of derivations centred at $\phi$. Define $T_p X = \mathrm{Der}(k[X], \mathrm{ev}_p)$.

My thoughts so far:

A morphism $\psi : Y \to X$ of affine varieties gives rise to a $k$-algebra homomorphism $\psi^*: k[X] \to k[Y]$ which maps $g \mapsto g \circ \psi$. This in turn gives rise to a $k$-linear map $d_\psi : T_pY \to T_{\psi(p)}X$, by sending $D \mapsto D \circ \psi^*$.

So for the case in question, we have a morphism $i : Y \to X$ given by the inclusion map, under which $i(p) = p$, so this looks pretty promising. I need to show that the map $d_i$ is a bijection.

If $d_i(D) = 0$, then $D \circ i^* = 0$ - I think this can only happen if $D$ is the zero map, so we have injectivity. Surjectivity I'm unsure about, and I haven't used $f$ anywhere yet. Any hints would be appreciated


share|cite|improve this question

The variety $X$ has a local ring $\mathcal O_{X,p}$ at $p$.
If $\mathfrak m \subset\mathcal O_{X,p} $ is its maximal ideal we have $T^*_p(X)=\mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2$, a $k$-vector space, and the dual of that vector space is the tangent space of $X$ at $p$ : $T_p(X)=(\mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2)^*$.
Since the local ring $\mathcal O_{X,p}$ does not change if you replace $X$ by an open neighbourhood $U$ of $p$, you have $T_p(X)=T_p(U)$.
Apply to $U=X\setminus Z(f)=Y$

The tangent space I defined is called the Zariski tangent space and is easily seen to be isomorphic to your tangent space defined with derivations.
The basic idea is that given your derivation $D$, you can extend it to $\mathcal O_{X,p}$, then restrict it to $\mathfrak m$ and since this linear form is zero on $\frak m^2$ you finally obtain a linear form on $\mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2$, a tangent vector in the Zariski sense.

share|cite|improve this answer

In your definition of the tangent space, $X = \text{Spec }A$? I would approach this a little differently. Namely, show that any such derivation arises from a derivation of the local ring at $p$. It will then follow that your definition of the tangent space is independent of the choice of affine neighborhood of $p$ that you choose.

Note that a priori your definition of the tangent space doesn't make sense for non-affine varieties, so you really need to check independence of the choice of affine neighborhood anyway to have a reasonable definition.

share|cite|improve this answer
Sorry, I was unclear. I'm only defining the tangent space here for affine varieties. My notes then use the answer to this question as a justification for the definition of the tangent space for an arbitrary variety: define $T_p X = T_p U$ where $U$ is any affine open neighbourhood of $p$ – algeom Apr 26 '12 at 22:45
I should (perhaps) also add that the most general variety I deal with in my course is a projective variety – algeom Apr 26 '12 at 22:47
Got it. Again, if you show that any such derivation arises from a derivation of the local ring at $p$, then you will have shown that the definition does not depend on the choice of open affine neighborhood. – user29743 Apr 26 '12 at 23:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.