Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have this problem: let $f_n$ converge weakly to $f$ in $L^2[0,1]$ and let $$F_n(x)=\int_0^xf_n(t) \, \textrm{d}t,$$ $$F(x)=\int_0^xf(t) \, \textrm{d}t.$$ Then $F_n,F$ are continuous and $F_n$ converges uniformly to $F$.

Writing $$F_n(x)=\int_0^1 f_n(t) \mathbb{1}_{[0,x]} \, \textrm{d}t$$ and applying the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem it should be proved the continuity of $F_n$ and analougosly of $F$. But I don't know about the uniform convergence and how to use the weak convergence hypotesis..

share|improve this question
    
A more bare-hands proof can be found here –  user31373 Aug 13 '12 at 22:44
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

It's possible there is a simpler approach, but I'd proceed as follows.

  1. Show that $F_n \to F$ pointwise.

  2. It would suffice to show that $\{F_n\}$ is equicontinuous. (Remember the Arzela-Ascoli theorem and/or its proof.)

  3. Show that the weak convergence implies that $\sup_n \|f_n\|_{L^2} < \infty$. (Use the uniform boundedness principle.)

  4. Use the previous step together with Cauchy-Schwarz to estimate $|F_n(x) - F_n(y)|$ independently of $n$.

share|improve this answer
    
May I ask you what you mean exactly in point 2? Why would it suffice to show $\{F_n\}$ is equicontinuous? Consider for example the case in which the sequence $(f_n)_n$ is bounded in $L^2$. In that case, the $F_n$ would be equi-$\alpha$-holder, with $\alpha=\frac{1}{2}$... How would you conclude? Thank you very much and sorry for disturbing. –  Romeo Oct 29 '13 at 18:57
    
@Romeo: It is a fact that a sequence of functions which is equicontinuous and converges pointwise on a compact set must converge uniformly. This fact is contained in the proof of Arzela-Ascoli; you can also get it from the conclusion of Arzela-Ascoli by noting that compactness means the sequence has at least one uniform limit point, but pointwise convergence means this limit point is unique. –  Nate Eldredge Oct 29 '13 at 19:44
    
@Romeo: And by the way, $\{f_n\}$ must be bounded in $L^2$ by my point 3. –  Nate Eldredge Oct 29 '13 at 19:45
    
Yes, I get it now. I didn't remember that fact, thanks for your kind reply and sorry for the stupid question. –  Romeo Oct 29 '13 at 22:17
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.