Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Riemann curvature tensor can be expressed as:

$$R^\rho{}_{\sigma\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu\Gamma^\rho{}_{\nu\sigma} - \partial_\nu\Gamma^\rho_{\mu\sigma} + \Gamma^\rho{}_{\mu\lambda}\Gamma^\lambda{}_{\nu\sigma} - \Gamma^\rho{}_{\nu\lambda}\Gamma^\lambda{}_{\mu\sigma}$$

where the $$\Gamma^{k}{}_{ij}$$ are the Christoffel symobols. $$\begin{align} \Gamma^m{}_{ij}= g^{mk}\Gamma_{kij}\\ =\frac12\, g^{mk} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j} g_{ki} +\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i} g_{kj} -\frac{\partial}{\partial x^k} g_{ij} \right) =\frac12\, g^{mk} \left( g_{ki,j} + g_{kj,i} - g_{ij,k} \right) \,. \end{align}$$ with $g_{ij}$ metric tensor of the manifold.

My question is:

given a manifold with metric tensor $g_{\mu\nu}$ we can calculate the Riemann tensor. But, given a $R^\rho{}_{\sigma\mu\nu}$, does exist only a $g_{\mu\nu}$ having that Riemann curvature tensor or there ar many metric tensors with the given $R^\rho{}_{\sigma\mu\nu}$? Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
1) See M. Berger's wonderful "A panoramic view of Riemannian geometry" for a detailed discussion of your question. The short answer is that many metrics can share a curvature tensor. 2) Please never use the Christoffel symbols, but strive to express all calculations in coordinate invariant notation (for your own sanity's sake). There's a lovely discussion of the evolution of notations and concepts in Riemannian geometry in Vol. 2 of Spivak's opus, which is put to great use in Gallot, Hulin & Lafontaine's "Riemannian geometry", which is very good for a beginner. – Gunnar Þór Magnússon Apr 24 '12 at 15:34
This isn't how the align environment works; you need to use & to mark the spots where the alignment should take place. – joriki Apr 24 '12 at 17:10
up vote 3 down vote accepted

A simple counterexample is a flat Euclidean space of any dimension. The Riemann curvature is uniformly zero. A diffeomorphism of the space back to itself stretching/shrinking/shearing the space can be thought of as a change of metric on the original space, but the curvature remains zero. This argument should generalize to any manifold with constant fixed curvature (n-spheres & hyperbolic geometries), but when the curvature is not constant an automorphism may not preserve the curvature at some points.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.