Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Question: Let $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$ with $a < b$ and let $f: [a,b] \rightarrow [a,b]$ continuous. Show: $f$ has a fixed point, that is, there is an $x \in [a,b]$ with $f(x)=x$.

I suppose this has to do with the basic definition of continuity. The definition I am using is that $f$ is continuous at $a$ if $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x)$ exists and if $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a)$. I must not be understanding it, since I am not sure how to begin showing this... Should I be trying to show that $x$ is both greater than or equal to and less than or equal to $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x)$ ?

share|cite|improve this question
    
I don't know what lim_{x \to x} f(x) is supposed to mean. Try drawing some examples of f (say with a = 0, b = 1) to convince yourself that this is plausible, then think about the intermediate value theorem. – Qiaochu Yuan Dec 8 '10 at 23:28
up vote 13 down vote accepted

Let $g(x) = f(x) - x$. Then $g$ is continuous and $g(a) \geq 0$ while $g(b) \leq 0$. By the Intermediate Value Theorem, $g$ has at least one zero on $[a, b]$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Consider $x-f(x)$ and use Intermediate Value Theorem.

share|cite|improve this answer

Consider $g(x)=f(x)-x$. $f(a)\ge a$ so $g(a)=f(a)-a\ge 0$. $f(b)\le b$ so $g(b)=f(b)-b\le 0$. By the Intermediate Value Theorem, since $g$ is continuous and $0\in[g(b),g(a)]$ there exists $c\in[a,b]$ such that $g(c)=f(c)-c=0$, so $f(c)=c$ for some $c\in[a,b]$.

share|cite|improve this answer

For a different approach then the ones above, let us take $a = 0$ and $b = 1$. So assume $f:[0,1] \to [0,1]$ has no fixed point. Then $[0,1] = \{x \in [0,1] : f(x) < x\} \cup \{x \in [0,1] : f(x) > x \}$. Now argue that this is not possible.

share|cite|improve this answer

You could argue on the contradiction by assuming your given function has a fixed point. By definition a function has a fixed point iff $f(x) = x$. If you substitute your function into the definition it would be clear you get an impossible mathematical equality, thus you have proved by contradiction that your function does not have a fixed point. Hope this helps. Try with $f(x) = 1+ e^x$, because as already stated it is one of the functions which has no fixed point.

share|cite|improve this answer

If f(0) = 0 we are done. If the former is not true then, since f: [0,1] -> [0,1], it must be that f(0) > 0. Applying the same reasoning we conclude that f(1) = 1 (and we are done) or f(1) < 1. Lets asume then that f(0)>0 and f(1)<1 .

Take g: [0,1] -> [0,1] such that g(x) = f(x) - x. If 0 belongs to Image(g) then we are done. If it does not, then Image(g) is contained in the union the following disjoint sets: (-infinity,0) and (0,+infinity).

These two open sets disconect Image(g), but g was continuous and [0,1] was connected. Absurd

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.