Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the following commutative diagram with exact rows (of $R$-modules and $R$-linear maps):

$$ \newcommand{\ra}[1]{\kern-1.5ex\xrightarrow{\ \ #1\ \ }\phantom{}\kern-1.5ex} \newcommand{\da}[1]{\bigg\downarrow\raise.5ex\rlap{\scriptstyle#1}} \begin{array}{c} 0 & \ra{} & M' & \ra{f} & M & \ra{g} & M'' & \ra{} & 0\\ & &\da{\alpha'} &&\da{\alpha} &&\da{\alpha''}\\ 0 & \ra{} & N' & \ra{\smash{f'}} & N & \ra{\smash{g'}} & N'' & \ra{} & 0 \end{array} $$

Suppose $\alpha^{'}$ is an isomorphism. I want to show that there is an exact sequence: $$0 \longrightarrow M \xrightarrow{\ (g,\alpha)\ } M^{''} \oplus N \xrightarrow{(\alpha^{''},-g')} N^{''} \longrightarrow 0$$

Two questions: to show the last map is surjective, can we simply let $n$ be in $N^{''}$ then since $g^{'}$ is surjective we can find $x \in N$ such that $g(x)=n$. So take $(0,-x) \in M^{''} \oplus N$.

Question 2: I need to show that the image of the first (nonzero map) is equal to the kernel of $(\alpha^{''},-g')$. I'm stuck in showing that the kernel is contained in the image, can you please help with this part?

share|improve this question
1  
Unfortunately, MathJax (and hence math.SE) does not support \xymatrix. See this meta thread for some possibilities of how to typeset one. Also, \begin{center} and \end{center} are not supported (I believe); you can make a displayed (and hence centered) equation by using $$ instead of $. –  Arturo Magidin Apr 21 '12 at 4:30
    
I was almost done implementing Jack Schmidt's solution when you edited; I've re-edited. If you prefer your edited version instead, you can roll-back. –  Arturo Magidin Apr 21 '12 at 4:38
    
@Arturo Magidin: thanks! that looks way better. –  user6495 Apr 21 '12 at 4:39
    
I have made some edits to improve the layout of the commutative diagram, but it won't be available until peer reviewed, since I don't have editing privileges. –  Davide Cervone Apr 21 '12 at 14:01
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted
  1. Yes; what you state would show that the map $(\alpha'',-g')$ is onto, except for the typo: you used $g$ when you meant $g'$.

  2. Suppose $(m'',n)$ lies in the kernel. That means that $\alpha''(m'')=g'(n)$. Since $g$ is onto, there exists $m\in M$ such that $g(m)=m''$, so $$g'(n) = \alpha''(m'') = \alpha''(g(m)) = g'(\alpha(m)).$$ Therefore, $n-\alpha(m)\in\mathrm{ker}(g')$; therefore, there exists $n'\in N'$ such that $f'(n') = n-\alpha(m)$. Let $m'\in M'$ correspond to $n'$. Then $$\alpha(f(m')) = f'(\alpha'(m')) = f'(n') = n-\alpha(m).$$ Therefore, $\alpha(f(m')+m) = n$. So $$(g,\alpha)(m,f(m')+m) = (g(m),\alpha(f(m')+m)) = (m'',n),$$ so $(m'',n)\in\mathrm{Im}(g,\alpha)$.

    Added. Note that we only require $\alpha'$ to be onto (not necessarily an isomorphism); this guarantees the existence of $m'\in M'$ with $\alpha'(m') = n'$, which suffices for the inclusion here.

  3. Now, if $m\in M$, then $$(\alpha'',-g')\bigl((g,\alpha)(m)\bigr) = (\alpha'',-g')(g(m),\alpha(m)) = \alpha''(g(m)) - g'(\alpha(m)) = 0$$ so $\mathrm{Im}(g,\alpha)\subseteq \mathrm{ker}(\alpha'',-g')$.

share|improve this answer
    
thanks, a question: $n \in N$ right? and the domain of $f$ is $M'$ yes? so how can we evaluate $f(n)$? –  user6495 Apr 22 '12 at 19:17
    
@user6495: There were some errors in that paragraph (a few letters in the wrong place). Fixed. –  Arturo Magidin Apr 22 '12 at 20:11
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.