Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For local martingales (as in Pro05)

$\text{[Local/general square integrability]} \overset{?}{\leftrightarrow} \text{[continuity]}$

That is, does one imply the other? I believe $ [\text{continuity}] \rightarrow [\text{local square integrability}]$

Can anyone say one way or another? Any counterexamples to help develop intuition? (I have very little here)

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Neither implies the other.

Let $X$ be any integrable random variable with $EX = 0$ and $E X^2 < \infty$, and let $X_t = X 1_{(1, \infty)}(t)$. Then $X_t$ is a square integrable martingale which is not continuous.

Let $Y$ be any integrable random variable with $E Y^2 = \infty$. Let $Y_t = Y$ for all $t$. Then $Y_t$ is a continuous martingale which is not even locally square integrable.

share|cite|improve this answer

If $(X_t)_{t\geq 0}$ is a continuous local martingale and $(\sigma_n)$ is a localizing sequence such that $(X^{\sigma_n}_t)_{t\geq 0}$ is a martingale, then you can use the localizing sequence $$ \tau_n=\inf \{t>0\mid |X_t|>n\},\quad n\geq 1, $$ and put $\rho_n=\tau_n\wedge \sigma_n$. Then by continuity we have $|X^{\rho_n}_t|\leq n$ for all $n\geq 1$ and hence $(X^{\rho_n}_t)$ is a bounded martingale for every $n$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.