Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there any theorem or proof that if a function satisfy the functional equation $ f(1-s)=f(s)$ and $ f(s) >0$ for each real $s$ then $ f(s)= \xi(s)$ or $ f(s)= \operatorname{const}$?

share|improve this question
    
Did you mean to say $f(s) = \kappa \cdot \xi(s)$ for some $\kappa > 0$ ? –  Sasha Apr 20 '12 at 18:55
    
aha.. considering $ f(s)$ is positive and differentiable for each real number , so we avoid the solutions similar to $ |s(1-s)| $ –  Jose Garcia Apr 20 '12 at 19:22
2  
False. Try $f(s) = \cos(2\pi s) + 2$. –  KCd Apr 20 '12 at 20:17
5  
Or, more simply, $f(s) = (s(1-s))^2 + 1$. You should look up Hamburger's theorem if you're trying to find conditions under which the completed zeta-function is characterized up to a scaling factor. –  KCd Apr 20 '12 at 20:23
    
where can i find hamburguers theorem ?? –  Jose Garcia Apr 20 '12 at 20:49
show 2 more comments

2 Answers

The question is wrong.

In fact for the functional equation $f(1-s)=f(s)$, its general solution, according to http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/en/solutions/fe/fe1113.pdf, should be $f(s)=\Phi(s,1-s)$, where $\Phi(s,1-s)$ is any symmetric function of $s$ and $1-s$.

And also there are infintely many $\Phi(s,1-s)$ satisfly $\Phi(s,1-s)>0$ for each real $s$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

If $f(s)$ is a solution then so is $f^2$ or $e^f$ or $H(f(s))$ for any positivity-preserving function $H$. The functional equation alone does not characterize the (completed) zeta function up to a finite number of parameters.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.