Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question is similar to the question link.

Let $A= \mathbb C [t^2,t^{-2}]$ and $B= \mathbb C [t,t^{-1}]$. Given $r\in \mathbb Z_+$ and $f\in B$ with the form $f=(t-a_1)(t-a_2)\cdots(t-a_k)$, where $a_i\in \mathbb C\setminus \{0\}$ with $a_i^k\ne a_j^k$ $(i\ne j)$ for $k=1,2$, let $I$ be the ideal of $B$ generated by $f^r$. Define the natural map $\phi: A \to B/I$ by $t^k\mapsto \overline{t^k}$ for all $k\in \mathbb 2Z$.

QUESTION: Is the map $\phi$ surjective?

Notice that the link above mentioned is the particular case with $r=1$.

share|cite|improve this question

Yes, $\phi$ is surjective.

$\newcommand{\CC}{\mathbb C}$ By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, $$B/I\simeq \prod_i \CC[t]/(t-a_i)^r, \quad A\twoheadrightarrow \prod_i \CC[t^2]/(t^2-a_i^2)^r$$ ($t^{-1}$ and $t^{-2}$ desappear because $a_i\ne 0$ and the second part uses the hypothesis $a_i\ne\pm a_j$ if $i\ne j$). So it is enough to show that $\CC[t^2]/(t^2-a_i^2)^r \to \CC[t]/(t-a_i)^r$ is surjective. Or, writting $a=a_i$, that $$ \psi: \CC[t^2]\to \CC[t]/(t-a)^r$$ is surjective. Let $C=\psi(\CC[t^2])$. This is a subring of the local Artinian ring $R:=\CC[t]/(t-a)^r$. Let $m=(t-a)R$ be the maximal ideal of $R$. As $t-a=(t^2-a^2)/2a-(t-a)^2/2a$, we get $$m \subseteq (t^2-a^2)\CC + m^2. \tag{#}$$ For any $n\ge 2$, taking the $n$th powers, we get $$m^n\subseteq (t^2-a^2)^n\CC +m^{n+1}.$$ So $$m\subseteq (t^2-a^2)\CC+ (t^2-a^2)^2\CC+\dots +(t^2-a^2)^n\CC + m^{n+1}\subseteq C+m^{n+1}.$$ Taking $n=r-1$, then $m\subseteq C$. As $\CC\subseteq C$ and $R=\CC+m$, we have $R=C$.

share|cite|improve this answer
@user2764: I don't see the problem when $r=1$ (then $m=0$ in $R$ and you only have to deal with constants). – user18119 Apr 25 '12 at 5:29
Unless there is a very good reason, we prefer not to arbitrarily delete good content: the answers could well help other users in the future. – robjohn Aug 9 '13 at 23:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.