Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a follow up about a case I'd been meaning to ask in a question I asked about a week ago.

Suppose $V$ is a vector space of dimension $2n$, and let $W(V)$ be the associated Weyl algebra, which can be viewed as an associative $k$-algebra with generators $x_1,\dots,x_n,y_1,\dots,y_n$ satisfying the relations $$ [x_i,x_j]=0=[y_i,y_j],\qquad [y_i,x_j]=\delta_{ij}. $$

Now let $R=k[X_1,\dots,X_n]$. I'll use $x_i$ to be the $k$-linear operator on $R$ given by multiplication on $X_i$, and let $\partial_i=\frac{\partial}{\partial X_i}$.

I know that there is a homomorphism from the tensor algebra $T(V)\to\operatorname{End}_k(R)$ sending $x_i$ to $x_i$ and $y_i$ to $\partial_i$, which respects the relations above, and hence gives a homomorphism $\varphi\colon W(V)\to\operatorname{End}_k(R)$. In this way $R$ is a $W(V)$ module.

As seen earlier, if $\operatorname{char}(k)=p>0$, then $\partial_i^p=0$, but then $\varphi(\partial_i^p)=y_i^p=0$, so $\varphi$ is not injective with trivial kernel. However, if $\operatorname{char}(k)=0$, does this in fact force $\varphi$ to be a monomorphism? I tried showing the kernel is now trivial, but I'm having a hard time getting a grip on arbitrary $t\in W(V)$ when $\varphi(t)=0$. And does such injectivity imply $R$ is simple and faithful as a module over $W(V)$?

share|improve this question
Dear Vika, Alex's answer below is correct. To verify the injectivity for yourself, write down a differential operator, and then find a polynomial that is not annihilated by it. If you're not sure how to do that, try first setting $n = 1$ and try low degree operators (degree $0$, $1$, and $2$ to begin with). Once you get a feeling for how the differential operators actually act on various polynomials, you will have no trouble proving the injectivity in general. Regards, –  Matt E Apr 19 '12 at 0:25

1 Answer 1

Yes, this is true. If you are looking at characteristic zero then your map $\varphi$ is an embedding and so $R$ is a faithful $W(V)$ module

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.