Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Derive a formula for $C_k-C_{k-3}$ in terms of partial quotients $a_k$ and nominal denominators $q_k$.

Recall that



$$\begin{matrix} \begin{align} p_0&=a_0 & q_0&=1\\ p_1&=a_0a_1+1 & q_1&=a_1\\ p_k&=a_kp_{k-1}+p_{k-2} & q_k&=a_kq_{k-1}+q_{k-2} \end{align} \end{matrix}$$

This is what I did:

$$\begin{align} C_k-C_{k-3}&=\frac{p_k}{q_k}-\frac{p_{k-3}}{q_{k-3}}=\frac{p_kq_{k-3}-p_{k-3}q_k}{q_kq_{k-3}}=\frac{(a_kp_{k-1}+p_{k-2})q_{k-3}-p_{k-3}(a_kq_{k-1}+q_{k-2})}{q_kq_{k-3}}\\ &=\frac{a_k(p_{k-1}q_{k-3}-p_{k-3}q_{k-1})+p_{k-2}q_{k-3}-p_{k-3}q_{k-2}}{q_kq_{k-3}}\\ &=\frac{a_k(p_{k-1}q_{k-3}-p_{k-3}q_{k-1})+(-1)^{k-3}}{q_kq_{k-3}} \end{align}$$

This is because of a theorem which states that


I get stuck here: I do not know how to get rid of the $p$'s so that the expression will be in terms of $a$'s and $q$'s alone.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Notice that you have proved $$p_kq_{k-3}-p_{k-3}q_k=a_k(p_{k-1}q_{k-3}-p_{k-3}q_{k-1})+(-1)^{k-3}$$ So you have replaced $p_k$ and $q_k$ with $p_{k-1}$ and $q_{k-1}$ (and introduced $a_k$, and $(-1)^{k-3}$). Perhaps if you do the process two more times you will get $p_{k-3}q_{k-3}-p_{k-3}q_{k-3}$, and your troubles will be over.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.