Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $Q$ be a finite quiver and denote the stationary parts of $Q$ by $e_{i}$. Suppose we have two arrows $f,g$ such that their composition $f \circ g$ is equal to $e_{i}$. Does this always implies that $f=g=e_{i}$?

share|cite|improve this question

When you say arrow, I assume $f,g\in Q_1$. Then the answer is no. Note that the trivial path (which I assume here is the stationary path you wrote) is defined to have path length zero, and we usually do not think of $e_i$ as elements in $Q_1$, they really are elements of $Q_0$.

Be careful if you are asking a question about representations of path algebra of quiver, then $fg=e_i$ is not in any admissible ideal since path length of $e_i$ is zero. The path algebra of a quiver arise from $kQ/I$ where $I$ needs to be admissible, i.e. contains elements of path length $\geq 2$. Representation-theoretically, $fg=e_i$ means you go two radical layer down the projective (indecomposable) module corresponding to $i$ and you ended up in the simple top, this does not make any sense (this is also the reason why path algebra are defined using admissible ideals).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.