Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Before I make myself clear, I wish to say that I do not want to know a sequence like the binary sequence. If possible, I'd want a sequence smaller than the binary sequence, of polynomial growth rate (please avoid exponential growth rates of terms) - though the latter option need not necessarily be satisfied if not possible.

In other words, I mean to say, given a certain $k$ and a length $n$ for the sequence, we have to generate a sequence of $n$ terms whose $k$ terms' sum is always unique.

An extremely trivial example, $1, 2, 3, 4, 5$ is a sequence of $5$ terms, where no $k$ terms' sum (here $k=1$) are equal in any way, and $6, 16, 30, 48$ for $n=4, k=2$ and the $a$th term $=ak(a+k)$.

share|cite|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

For the case $k=2$, you may be interested in the Mian-Chowla sequence, seen at It starts 1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 21, 31, 45, 66, 81, 97, 123, 148, 182, 204, 252, 290, 361, 401, 475, 565, 593, 662, 775, 822, 916, 970, 1016, 1159, 1312, 1395, 1523, 1572, 1821, 1896, 2029, 2254, 2379, 2510, 2780, 2925, 3155, 3354, 3591, 3797, 3998, 4297, 4433, 4779, 4851, and each term is as small as possible given the restriction of $a+b\ne c+d$. You might be interested in $B_2$ sequences more generally. There is a copious literature.

EDIT: Guy, 3rd edition, page 351 (problem E28) writes, "Let $a_1\lt a_2\lt\cdots$ be an infinite sequence of integers for which all the triple sums $a_i+a_j+a_k$ are distinct. Erdos offers \$500.00 for a proof or disproof of an old conjecture of his, that $\lim(a_n/n^3)=\infty$."

share|cite|improve this answer
Fine, what about other $k$? – Mach9 Apr 16 '12 at 15:12
I don't know. I'm sure there's a literature, as it's a natural question. Two suggestions: 1) see if it's in Richard Guy's book, Unsolved Problems In Number Theory. 2) calculate some small examples and look them up in the OEIS - that's what I did for $k=2$. – Gerry Myerson Apr 17 '12 at 0:22
BTW How did you pull that off for $k=2$? – Mach9 Apr 17 '12 at 12:17
Just because the pairwise sums are distinct, doesn't that make it distinct for all $k$? – Mach9 Apr 17 '12 at 12:19
No, e.g., in Mian-Chowla, $1+4+13=2+8+8$, $2+4+81=8+13+66$, etc. For $k=2$ it was easy to find the first five or so terms by hand, then search the OEIS. – Gerry Myerson Apr 17 '12 at 13:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.