Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

An abstract affine algebraic $k$-variety is the correspondence which assigns to each $k$-algebra $K$ a set $X(K)$. This assignment must satisfy the following:

(i). For each homomorphism of $k$-algebras $φ : K → K_0$ there is a map $X(φ): X(K) → X(K_0)$

(ii). $X(\operatorname{id}_K) = \operatorname{id}_X(K)$

(iii). For any $φ_0 : K → K_0$ and $φ_1 : K_0 → K_1$ we have $X(φ_1 \circ φ_0) = X(φ_1) \circ X(φ_0)$.

(iv). There exists a finitely generated $k$-algebra $A$ such that for each $K$ there is a bijection $X(K) → \operatorname{Hom}_k(A, K)$ and the maps $X(φ)$ correspond to the composition maps $\operatorname{Hom}(A, K) → \operatorname{Hom}_k(A, K_0)$, where the composition maps are the maps induced by homomorphism of $k$-algebras $\beta :K \to K_0$ in the obvious way (composing), and where $\operatorname{Hom}_k(A,B)$ denotes the set of all homomorphisms of $k$-algebras $f:A \to B$ (i.e ringhomomorphism that fix the field $k$).


Let the correspondence taking a $k$-algebra $K$ $$ K \to O(n,K) = \left\{n\times n \text{ matrices with entries in }K\text{ such that }M^T = T^{-1}\right\} $$ (i.e orthogonal matrix over the $K$-algebra $K$).

Prove that it's an abstract algebraic variety. I proved everything, except that has (iv). I don't know what $K$-algebra $A$ to consider :/.

share|cite|improve this question
You can forget about inverse matrices and adjoints: just write out the $n^2$ polynomial equations (in the entries $x_{ij}$ of $M$) translating the matrix equality $M^T\cdot M=I_n$ – Georges Elencwajg Apr 16 '12 at 12:08
@Georges Elencwajg Good Idea! it generates the same system!. But Why this algebra works? How can I define the bijection <.<? I have no idea! – Arkj Apr 16 '12 at 12:12
Dear @Arkj: you should ask your teacher or mathematicians who advocate that varieties be defined as functors in elementary courses. – Georges Elencwajg Apr 16 '12 at 12:17
What I mean is that the link between the elementary definition of algebraic variety and the functorial definition is a long story if you want to tell it well. – Georges Elencwajg Apr 16 '12 at 12:50

Write $$M^{-1} = \frac{1}{\det M} M^{ad},$$ then you get a bunch of Polynomial equations from $$M^{T} = M^{-1},$$ i.e. for every entry $$P_{i,j}(x_{1,1}, \cdots, x_{n,n}) = 0.$$

Your $K$-algebra is then the quotient $$A = K[x_{1,1}, \cdots ,x_{n,n}] / < P_{i,j} : 1 \leq i,j \leq n>.$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Wow! And How can I prove that O.o? – Arkj Apr 15 '12 at 18:06
Sorry for my stupid question – Arkj Apr 15 '12 at 18:35
Sorry for ask, could you tell me what is the bijection map? <.<! – Arkj Apr 16 '12 at 1:35
A functional of $K[ \dots ]$ is pluggin some values for $K$ in $x_{i,j}$. I will not give any further hints, since this seems like a homerwork problem. – Apr 16 '12 at 8:19
@Arkj: What is O.o ? – Georges Elencwajg Apr 16 '12 at 12:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.